Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the erofs-fixes tree

[Baokun Li <libaokun@huaweicloud.com>]

Hi Stephen,

On 2024/4/24 8:24, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
>
>    fs/erofs/super.c
>
> between commits:
>
>    ab1bbc1735ff ("erofs: get rid of erofs_fs_context")
>    569a48fed355 ("erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode")
>
> from the erofs-fixes tree and commit:
>
>    e4f586a41748 ("erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode")
>
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - I used the former version) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
Christian previously mentioned that the fix from the vfs-brauner tree
was an accident:

"An an accident on my part as I left it in the vfs.fixes branch."

So the two commits from the erofs-fixes tree are the final fixes.

I'm very sorry for any inconvenience caused.

Thanks,
Baokun