From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5747C433EF for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239323AbhKWR2a (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:28:30 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0089.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.89]:59004 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234416AbhKWR22 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:28:28 -0500 Received: from omf09.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0D618225E09; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:25:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6D904E000354; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2243:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels From: Joe Perches To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: kernel test robot , llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , Nathan Chancellor Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:25:17 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20211123165057.GA7382@embeddedor> References: <202111230719.OZDUHU4z-lkp@intel.com> <20211123005528.GA550759@embeddedor> <20211123165057.GA7382@embeddedor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: b7d1gcsizzptxunoomxpxxup7dmzqm44 X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6D904E000354 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+jMFOfgZkymPvJY5ZOxOiWXjv9rAWCmrQ= X-HE-Tag: 1637688317-268891 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 10:50 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:52:30AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > Perhaps this would be better: > > Feel free to send a proper patch. I commented on your proposed patch. And I'd prefer you actually look at and improve the code instead of merely silencing warnings.