From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0031df01.pphosted.com [205.220.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C767D10E9; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 10:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743762828; cv=none; b=dsvx38CfVF0gEFBtYKEAehSdCDnkSh85CtZQUg9Nu0vWfagqEgYAmINVvDn447wDQVY8bQ9OX2Az44ja1xXQpDSL5Uxa3kt22N8qO36LroNefCEjBDCrlBwRyI90YNcKo8vUwyqvuXnvmyzZkvkZhtWVWkkkWL/F+3G2W+ViuZE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743762828; c=relaxed/simple; bh=38upGB0DbOTlqZuiMJDcmdUwubOS+Q8tO4NLEP+t3aM=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=NRjbCDCYWzvybcUYXs1s4oqM83Ae81aIp3KdxN5Zjy8QEuVZQ3dwsQzAlv7cwXxslS70ieref0GujNe0VYHFQ/7w8BjoVkx4J6CCzS8Ih7VKoTrEubNzxGVC3Oj/bz7VOOVBfhInpkgSXLUfuIqe07tvvgrPJ/PV0TjQ6YaAoXE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b=JYqK8ygK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=205.220.180.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=quicinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=quicinc.com header.i=@quicinc.com header.b="JYqK8ygK" Received: from pps.filterd (m0279872.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 53433oJC012456; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 10:33:41 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=qcppdkim1; bh= lIOnZULnFX+QVwFsNZ/W3Tbhwbo208fPQklkCX8gMyg=; b=JYqK8ygKltlOLYBI yCvOT5vifwig97kV6O9W5NFtHepjaLaQaXU2F2WnEXVHnlwsYd+8KDcy0N0nvwA3 6fQfNi+0u+eeqK91cQJcJ+nUrowcrayNHiGFdFOJtTTcatHlQZYQQ9EhPefHCroc XP3I1Q+qdMvLFM17Lyr1MqbjClBUvb/NksvUlFcbgmpmwXIHFNOT5PhgM9hV9EPL 5pul9MFE+WDMLKpCqng49oLIiXW7bjbNenM0hijcyrauVffzMVCkJnhiMJr8H3zV CWewySg/XrFD0WjKzGIY/I/SgMesUZQa8EWy3cCNxya0VUt6gJvjlzdAjyGkOSTV hdWoOA== Received: from nasanppmta05.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) by mx0a-0031df01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 45t2d51fqb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:33:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com [10.52.223.231]) by NASANPPMTA05.qualcomm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 534AXdCQ015295 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Apr 2025 10:33:39 GMT Received: from [10.204.100.69] (10.80.80.8) by nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.9; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 03:33:35 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:03:32 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Reup: SM8350 and SC8280XP venus support Content-Language: en-US To: Bryan O'Donoghue , Dmitry Baryshkov CC: Stanimir Varbanov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Konrad Dybcio , Bjorn Andersson , , , , , Johan Hovold References: <20250304-b4-linux-media-comitters-sc8280xp-venus-v1-0-279c7ea55493@linaro.org> <8cfaeb25-2657-9df4-5cea-018aad62f579@quicinc.com> <1dd6e03d-09be-4853-741a-4fb47b7619a0@quicinc.com> <70891a99-d2ca-4fd3-a88d-2f66a9a78f66@kernel.org> From: Vikash Garodia In-Reply-To: <70891a99-d2ca-4fd3-a88d-2f66a9a78f66@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01b.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.141.250) To nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) X-QCInternal: smtphost X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: JFJ9DZSbqRMiS4GbkjyNFynO1TviuMIx X-Proofpoint-GUID: JFJ9DZSbqRMiS4GbkjyNFynO1TviuMIx X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Cvu/cm4D c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=67efb584 cx=c_pps a=JYp8KDb2vCoCEuGobkYCKw==:117 a=JYp8KDb2vCoCEuGobkYCKw==:17 a=GEpy-HfZoHoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=XR8D0OoHHMoA:10 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=atOABbsASZFoYH5kmBwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1095,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-04-04_04,2025-04-03_03,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=911 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 classifier=spam authscore=0 authtc=n/a authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2502280000 definitions=main-2504040072 On 4/4/2025 2:32 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 04/04/2025 06:24, Vikash Garodia wrote: >>>> How different is this from sm8250 which is already enabled on iris driver ? >>> As far as I remember, SM8250 support in Iris did not reach >>> feature-parity yet. So in my opinion it is fine to add new platforms to >>> the Venus driver, that will later migrate to the Iris driver. >> I would say, from decoder side all codecs are there now on Iris. H264 merged, >> while h265 and VP9 dec are posted as RFC, there is one compliance failure which >> is under debug to post them as regular patches. >> If we are mainly looking for decode usecases, then we should be on Iris. >> Preference would be to stay on Iris, otherwise we would have that extra ask to >> port it later from venus to iris. > > Right now venus represents 9/20 - 45% of the patches being churned for sc8280xp. > > https://github.com/jhovold/linux/tree/wip/sc8280xp-6.14-rc7 > > This is a good debate to have, however my memory of what we collectively agreed > both in public and private was to continue to merge new silicon <= HFI6XX into > venus unless and until iris hit feature parity for HFI6XX and to continue with > venus at that point for < HFI6XX. Agree. Would appreciate your help later as well when we migrate these SOCs to iris. Regards, Vikash > > So merging sc8280xp - HFI6XX is consistent with our agreement, the right thing > to do for our users and a big win in terms of technical debt reduction. > > I will post an update to this series ASAP. > > --- > bod