From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-171.mta1.migadu.com (out-171.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1EBE374E6D for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784641715; cv=none; b=Q3dKdPBWADWbKvjfig/YTtau4WgzMRAfOoMhoeSvONYWqn+D2RBiYT+D8eqgxhpooiixC01bEuYexgocQKy6wu7EAj24IIGEyr46a98ZxerU2RyCWXxUb12ItinU8Qt0ubdu6DVOgnRUOHUS+mc8Bi8IBdArIlIF+9YQfubErf0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784641715; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b0JmEFM09qmzdR3QS8OWc0cKSWWt36Rmn/jK5hZ5wtg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=u/Y5bgjuXNkDwsiB+7f3Wij/4ERvqZreoKG1iLdyMlSsHRnLu1Dfo3Gp5luUJaf4y3/3U/QrPZt9mBUVcvmlFtwN4vXbAAtiE6S7Xf8kHjlxnA7iwNfbWYKdJ0HAVTZcayCu3c/9HeO7naQusdKjmx1wYeNOzWRohRLSX/DjN8A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=GD5KPeQy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="GD5KPeQy" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1784641701; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jsA/uW7tTpaNhkYZL9W12T1ckBY53Lz+POwrMQx3yjQ=; b=GD5KPeQylmG9Izdv/nark9HTaf/mpff6c+LGfDqogTL4ufqyGi0/U80J59Cysavetf9dCb wRBQNoBm5sIvex8SsO7BUzDIdlWn2AJ1XOuswlwaVh/Wke1y8PfgunGMy+MpmBpiCxMt7T f6OR0sYLJA31p9xSrBqJ+mod9G2GCGM= Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:48:09 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 1/9] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Leon Hwang To: Emil Tsalapatis , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , Quentin Monnet , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com References: <20260715153254.92010-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> <20260715153254.92010-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 2026/7/17 13:28, Leon Hwang wrote: > On 17/7/26 13:08, Emil Tsalapatis wrote: >> On Wed Jul 15, 2026 at 11:32 AM EDT, Leon Hwang wrote: >>> There are many adjacent blank lines in the verifier that have accumulated >>> over time. >>> >>> Drop them for cleanup. >>> >>> No functional changes intended. >> >> >> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis > > Thanks for your review. > >> >> What about the files we factored out of the verifier? E.g., backtrack.c >> also has the same issue. > > > Probably, I can post a patch to clean all adjacent blank lines in > kernel/bpf/ when posting another series. Will drop all adjacent blank lines in kernel/bpf/ in the next revision, as I'm planning to post the next revision. Thanks, Leon