mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Add helpers to perform CPUID-based guest vendor check
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:48:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b752a4d4-b469-1a1f-c064-bf98a0467d49@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305013437.8578-3-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

On 3/5/2020 9:34 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Add helpers to provide CPUID-based guest vendor checks, i.e. to do the
> ugly register comparisons.  Use the new helpers to check for an AMD
> guest vendor in guest_cpuid_is_amd() as well as in the existing emulator
> flows.
> 
> Using the new helpers fixes a _very_ theoretical bug where
> guest_cpuid_is_amd() would get a false positive on a non-AMD virtual CPU
> with a vendor string beginning with "Auth" due to the previous logic
> only checking EBX.  It also fixes a marginally less theoretically bug
> where guest_cpuid_is_amd() would incorrectly return false for a guest
> CPU with "AMDisbetter!" as its vendor string.
> 
> Fixes: a0c0feb57992c ("KVM: x86: reserve bit 8 of non-leaf PDPEs and PML4Es in 64-bit mode on AMD")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h               |  2 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c             | 36 +++++++-----------------------
>   3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index bf5f5e476f65..2754972c36e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -393,6 +393,30 @@ struct x86_emulate_ctxt {
>   #define X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_ecx 0x6c65746e
>   #define X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_edx 0x49656e69
>   
> +static inline bool is_guest_vendor_intel(u32 ebx, u32 ecx, u32 edx)
> +{
> +	return ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_ebx &&
> +	       ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_ecx &&
> +	       edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_edx;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool is_guest_vendor_amd(u32 ebx, u32 ecx, u32 edx)
> +{
> +	return (ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_ebx &&
> +		ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_ecx &&
> +		edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_edx) ||
> +	       (ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AMDisbetterI_ebx &&
> +		ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AMDisbetterI_ecx &&
> +		edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AMDisbetterI_edx);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool is_guest_vendor_hygon(u32 ebx, u32 ecx, u32 edx)
> +{
> +	return ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_HygonGenuine_ebx &&
> +	       ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_HygonGenuine_ecx &&
> +	       edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_HygonGenuine_edx;
> +}
> +

Why not define those in cpuid.h ?
And also move X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_* to cpuid.h and remove the "EMUL" 
prefix.

>   enum x86_intercept_stage {
>   	X86_ICTP_NONE = 0,   /* Allow zero-init to not match anything */
>   	X86_ICPT_PRE_EXCEPT,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index 7366c618aa04..13eb3e92c6a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static inline bool guest_cpuid_is_amd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   	struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;
>   
>   	best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0, 0);
> -	return best && best->ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_ebx;
> +	return best && is_guest_vendor_amd(best->ebx, best->ecx, best->edx);
>   }
>   
>   static inline int guest_cpuid_family(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index dd19fb3539e0..9cf303984fe5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -2712,9 +2712,7 @@ static bool vendor_intel(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   
>   	eax = ecx = 0;
>   	ctxt->ops->get_cpuid(ctxt, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx, false);
> -	return ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_ebx
> -		&& ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_ecx
> -		&& edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_edx;
> +	return is_guest_vendor_intel(ebx, ecx, edx);
>   }
>   
>   static bool em_syscall_is_enabled(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> @@ -2733,34 +2731,16 @@ static bool em_syscall_is_enabled(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>   	ecx = 0x00000000;
>   	ops->get_cpuid(ctxt, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx, false);
>   	/*
> -	 * Intel ("GenuineIntel")
> -	 * remark: Intel CPUs only support "syscall" in 64bit
> -	 * longmode. Also an 64bit guest with a
> -	 * 32bit compat-app running will #UD !! While this
> -	 * behaviour can be fixed (by emulating) into AMD
> -	 * response - CPUs of AMD can't behave like Intel.
> +	 * remark: Intel CPUs only support "syscall" in 64bit longmode. Also a
> +	 * 64bit guest with a 32bit compat-app running will #UD !! While this
> +	 * behaviour can be fixed (by emulating) into AMD response - CPUs of
> +	 * AMD can't behave like Intel.
>   	 */
> -	if (ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_ebx &&
> -	    ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_ecx &&
> -	    edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_GenuineIntel_edx)
> +	if (is_guest_vendor_intel(ebx, ecx, edx))
>   		return false;
>   
> -	/* AMD ("AuthenticAMD") */
> -	if (ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_ebx &&
> -	    ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_ecx &&
> -	    edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AuthenticAMD_edx)
> -		return true;
> -
> -	/* AMD ("AMDisbetter!") */
> -	if (ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AMDisbetterI_ebx &&
> -	    ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AMDisbetterI_ecx &&
> -	    edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_AMDisbetterI_edx)
> -		return true;
> -
> -	/* Hygon ("HygonGenuine") */
> -	if (ebx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_HygonGenuine_ebx &&
> -	    ecx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_HygonGenuine_ecx &&
> -	    edx == X86EMUL_CPUID_VENDOR_HygonGenuine_edx)
> +	if (is_guest_vendor_amd(ebx, ecx, edx) ||
> +	    is_guest_vendor_hygon(ebx, ecx, edx))
>   		return true;
>   
>   	/*
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-05  3:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05  1:34 [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86: Trace the original requested CPUID function in kvm_cpuid() Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 17:50   ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: x86: Add helpers to perform CPUID-based guest vendor check Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  3:48   ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
2020-03-05 19:58     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 18:07   ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM x86: Extend AMD specific guest behavior to Hygon virtual CPUs Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: x86: Fix CPUID range checks for Hypervisor and Centaur classes Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 18:43   ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 19:25     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 21:10       ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05 21:51         ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06  9:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-10 17:10             ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-10 17:23               ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: x86: Add build-time assertions on validity of vendor strings Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: x86: Refactor out-of-range logic to contain the madness Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05  1:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: x86: Refactor kvm_cpuid() param that controls out-of-range logic Sean Christopherson
2020-03-05 16:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-05 17:12   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-06  8:45     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b752a4d4-b469-1a1f-c064-bf98a0467d49@intel.com \
    --to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®