Re: [PATCH] cxl/ocxl: Possible repeated word

[Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>]

Hello,

While the correction in the comment is of course ok, the patch was sent 
as html. You may want to check/fix how it was submitted.

   Fred


On 18/06/2023 17:08, zhumao001@208suo.com wrote:
> Delete repeated word in comment. Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao <zhumao001@ 
>  208suo. com> --- drivers/misc/cxl/native. c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 
> insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native. c 
> b/drivers/misc/cxl/native. cindex
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This Message Is From an External Sender
> This message came from outside your organization.
> Report Suspicious
> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/PjiDSg!2k-hI76VihO6WgXx-IHFLxDVOAL2DdWMKjPu4ApiehtDXYjNrTR1Cj6nYDmD8SP9M8AZ7TpWUloL0Ixn_2IX60uI2MsuBkM$>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
> Delete repeated word in comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Mao <zhumao001@208suo.com>
> ---
>   drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> index 50b0c44bb8d7..6957946a6463 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/native.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ int cxl_attach_dedicated_process_psl9(struct 
> cxl_context *ctx, u64 wed, u64 amr)
>        * Ideally we should do a wmb() here to make sure the changes to the
>        * PE are visible to the card before we call afu_enable.
>        * On ppc64 though all mmios are preceded by a 'sync' instruction 
> hence
> -     * we dont dont need one here.
> +     * we dont need one here.
>        */
> 
>       result = cxl_ops->afu_reset(afu);