From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
peterz@infradead.org, prarit@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com,
pmladek@suse.com, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/11] x86: text_poke() may access uninitialized struct pages
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:37:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7a0cdc8-5924-3ed4-07e2-41c212ccdb0a@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180621212518.19914-2-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
On 06/21/2018 02:25 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> It supposed to be safe to modify static branches after jump_label_init().
> But, because static key modifying code eventually calls text_poke() we
> may end up with accessing struct page that have not been initialized.
>
> Here is how to quickly reproduce the problem. Insert code like this
> into init/main.c:
>
> | +static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(__test);
> | asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
> | {
> | char *command_line;
> |@@ -587,6 +609,10 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
> | vfs_caches_init_early();
> | sort_main_extable();
> | trap_init();
> |+ {
> |+ static_branch_enable(&__test);
> |+ WARN_ON(!static_branch_likely(&__test));
> |+ }
> | mm_init();
>
> The following warnings show-up:
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:701 text_poke+0x20d/0x230
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1_pt_t1 #30
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:text_poke+0x20d/0x230
> Code: 0f 0b 4c 89 e2 4c 89 ee 4c 89 f7 e8 7d 4b 9b 00 31 d2 31 f6 bf 86 02
> 00 00 48 8b 05 95 8e 24 01 e8 78 18 d8 00 e9 55 ff ff ff <0f> 0b e9 54 fe
> ff ff 48 8b 05 75 a8 38 01 e9 64 fe ff ff 48 8b 1d
> RSP: 0000:ffffffff94e03e30 EFLAGS: 00010046
> RAX: 0100000000000000 RBX: fffff7b2c011f300 RCX: ffffffff94fcccf4
> RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff94e03e77 RDI: ffffffff94fcccef
> RBP: ffffffff94fcccef R08: 00000000fffffe00 R09: 00000000000000a0
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000040 R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: ffffffff94e03e77 R14: ffffffff94fcdcef R15: fffff7b2c0000000
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9adc87c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: ffff9adc8499d000 CR3: 000000000460a001 CR4: 00000000000606b0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Call Trace:
> ? start_kernel+0x23e/0x4c8
> ? start_kernel+0x23f/0x4c8
> ? text_poke_bp+0x50/0xda
> ? arch_jump_label_transform+0x89/0xe0
> ? __jump_label_update+0x78/0xb0
> ? static_key_enable_cpuslocked+0x4d/0x80
> ? static_key_enable+0x11/0x20
> ? start_kernel+0x23e/0x4c8
> ? secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0
> ---[ end trace abdc99c031b8a90a ]---
>
> If the code above is moved after mm_init(), no warning is shown, as struct
> pages are initialized during handover from memblock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> index 2ecd34e2d46c..e85ff65c43c3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> @@ -37,5 +37,6 @@ extern void *text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
> extern void *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len);
> extern int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs);
> extern void *text_poke_bp(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, void *handler);
> +extern int after_bootmem;
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_TEXT_PATCHING_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> index a481763a3776..0230dbc3c599 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -686,13 +686,21 @@ void *__init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode,
> *
> * Note: Must be called under text_mutex.
> */
> -void *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> +void __ref *text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> char *vaddr;
> struct page *pages[2];
> int i;
>
> + /* While boot memory allocator is runnig we cannot use struct
coding style:
/*
* While boot memory ....
But more importantly, does this patch need to be backported for stable?
> + * pages as they are not yet initialized. However, we also know
> + * that this is early in boot, and it is safe to fallback to
> + * text_poke_early.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!after_bootmem))
> + return text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len);
> +
> if (!core_kernel_text((unsigned long)addr)) {
> pages[0] = vmalloc_to_page(addr);
> pages[1] = vmalloc_to_page(addr + PAGE_SIZE);
>
thanks,
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 21:25 [PATCH v12 00/11] Early boot time stamps for x86 Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] x86: text_poke() may access uninitialized struct pages Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:37 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2018-06-25 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-25 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-25 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 12:32 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 14:06 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] x86: initialize static branching early Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-06-23 13:11 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] x86/tsc: redefine notsc to behave as tsc=unstable Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] kvm/x86: remove kvm memblock dependency Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-05 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06 9:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 9:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06 9:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 10:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 15:03 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-06 15:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] s390/time: add read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 7:07 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-06-25 12:45 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] time: replace read_boot_clock64() with read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] s390/time: remove read_boot_clock64() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] ARM/time: " Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 16:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 18:49 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 20:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 21:29 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 23:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-24 2:43 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-24 7:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 18:42 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 19:47 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-28 7:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 10:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-28 12:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 19:42 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-29 7:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-29 8:57 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-03 20:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-02 17:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-06-29 14:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-29 17:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-09 23:16 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] sched: early boot clock Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 12:44 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 19:23 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 11:27 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 11:51 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 15:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] x86/tsc: use tsc early Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 16:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 21:38 ` Pavel Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7a0cdc8-5924-3ed4-07e2-41c212ccdb0a@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®