From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tests: improve output of sigaltstack testcase
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:55:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7b4c45d-2f21-de6c-d1c8-16c8386da27c@list.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170206160443.55c0f1daac793f1464053cd6@linux-foundation.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1246 bytes --]
07.02.2017 03:04, Andrew Morton пишет:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:30:38 +0300 Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
>
>> So it seems my patches haven't made it into LKML
>> and I don't know if they made it into stable@ because
>> the archive link:
>> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable
>> doesn't work.
>> There is definitely something wrong here.
>>
>> So did they pass into a stable ML?
>> If not, Andy can I use your Acked-by when/if resending?
>> Are there any known problems with MLs and the archives now?
> I have a copy of [1/2] because I was on cc. I cannot locate a copy of
> [2/2]. Please cc Oleg on signal-related changes.
Thanks for taking these!
2/2 had the CCs to
CC: Shuah Khan<shuah@kernel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar<mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski<luto@kernel.org>
CC:linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
CC:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC:trivial@kernel.org
as it only changed the self-test.
Obviously I am getting spam-blocked somewhere.
I generate the CC list with get_maintainers.pl. Is this
the right thing to do?
Oleg was CCed on [1/2] as get_maintainers.pl mentioned
him.
I am attaching the [2/2] to this e-mail.
If this doesn't work, I can try to re-send it with more
CCs, but it will likely be blocked again.
[-- Attachment #2: 0002-tests-improve-output-of-sigaltstack-testcase.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1902 bytes --]
>From d4dc2ac235b5a18f5bdf916152509f8b0e11276e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 22:11:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tests: improve output of sigaltstack testcase
Currently it uses %i for bitmasks, which makes it difficult
to properly decode the values. Use %x instead.
Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@users.sourceforge.net>
CC: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: trivial@kernel.org
---
tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
index 1bb0125..ccd0734 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ void my_usr1(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *u)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (stk.ss_flags != SS_DISABLE)
- printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%i, should be SS_DISABLE\n",
+ printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%x, should be SS_DISABLE\n",
stk.ss_flags);
else
printf("[OK]\tsigaltstack is disabled in sighandler\n");
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ int main(void)
if (stk.ss_flags == SS_DISABLE) {
printf("[OK]\tInitial sigaltstack state was SS_DISABLE\n");
} else {
- printf("[FAIL]\tInitial sigaltstack state was %i; should have been SS_DISABLE\n", stk.ss_flags);
+ printf("[FAIL]\tInitial sigaltstack state was %x; "
+ "should have been SS_DISABLE\n", stk.ss_flags);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ int main(void)
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (stk.ss_flags != SS_AUTODISARM) {
- printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%i, should be SS_AUTODISARM\n",
+ printf("[FAIL]\tss_flags=%x, should be SS_AUTODISARM\n",
stk.ss_flags);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
--
2.9.3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-07 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-05 10:12 [PATCH v2 0/2] sigaltstack: SS_AUTODISARM fixes Stas Sergeev
[not found] ` <20170205101213.8163-2-stsp@list.ru>
2017-02-05 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for CONFIG_COMPAT Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-06 9:30 ` Stas Sergeev
2017-02-07 0:04 ` Andrew Morton
2017-02-07 8:55 ` Stas Sergeev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7b4c45d-2f21-de6c-d1c8-16c8386da27c@list.ru \
--to=stsp@list.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®