From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Daniel Lezcano" <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
"Zhang Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Lukasz Luba" <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@kernel.org>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>, "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"James Clark" <james.clark@linaro.org>,
"Huang Rui" <ray.huang@amd.com>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Perry Yuan" <perry.yuan@amd.com>,
"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>, "Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Drop 32-bit variants of *_on_cpu() MSR functions
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 11:40:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7e799a6-1f1a-49ef-8aac-0d5fd4a06dc7@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aiKUenaT9VD0DrpW@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2883 bytes --]
On 05.06.26 11:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jürgen Groß <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05.06.26 11:05, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Drop the variants using 2 32-bit values instead of a single 64-bit one
>>>> of the *_on_cpu() MSR access functions.
>>>>
>>>> Juergen Gross (8):
>>>> x86/msr: Switch rdmsr_on_cpu() to return a 64-bit quantity
>>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of rdmsrq_on_cpu() to use rdmsr_on_cpu()
>>>> x86/msr: Switch wrmsr_on_cpu() to use a 64-bit quantity
>>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of wrmsrq_on_cpu() to use wrmsr_on_cpu()
>>>> x86/msr: Switch rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() to return a 64-bit quantity
>>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu() to use rdmsr_safe_on_cpu()
>>>> x86/msr: Switch wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() to use a 64-bit quantity
>>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu() to use wrmsr_safe_on_cpu()
>>>
>>> To sum up my review feedback for the invididual patches, we want
>>> to do this instead:
>>>
>>> x86/msr: Convert rdmsrl_on_cpu() users to rdmsrq_on_cpu()
>>> x86/msr: Drop the rdmsrl_on_cpu() alias to rdmsrq_on_cpu()
>>>
>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of rdmsr_on_cpu() to use rdmsrq_on_cpu()
>>> x86/msr: Remove the unused rdmsr_on_cpu() API
>>>
>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of wrmsr_on_cpu() to use wrmsrq_on_cpu()
>>> x86/msr: Remove unused wrmsr_on_cpu() API
>>>
>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() to use rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu()
>>> x86/msr: Remove unused rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() API
>>>
>>> x86/msr: Switch all callers of wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() to use wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu()
>>> x86/mrs: Remove unused wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu() API
>>>
>>> Note how there's no "conversion" of the 32-bit API itself in this
>>> approach, we just do a straightforward migration of the users to
>>> the already existing 64-bit APIs, then remove any unused APIs.
>>
>> Fine with me, but I just wanted to get rid of the "q" and "l" suffices
>> completely, as they serve no special purpose after dropping all other
>> variants.
>>
>> OTOH if wanted such a switch could be done later easily.
>
> Well, we had a similar discussion back when we standardized on
> rdmsrq() and wrmsrq(), and we use them as our primary 64-bit
> MSR handling APIs. Why have a different pattern in any of the
> derived APIs? It should really use the same conceptual namespace,
> not some confusing mixture of two naming schemes.
In the long run I'd like to do the same conversion for the rdmsr*() and
wrmsr*() interfaces, too (so only offering and using the 64-bit variants).
I understand that this is not guaranteed to be accepted immediately after
this series, so I agree that it is better to keep the "q" suffix for now
in order to avoid confusion.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 7:08 Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/msr: Switch rdmsr_on_cpu() to return a 64-bit quantity Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/msr: Switch all callers of rdmsrq_on_cpu() to use rdmsr_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/msr: Switch wrmsr_on_cpu() to use a 64-bit quantity Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/msr: Switch all callers of wrmsrq_on_cpu() to use wrmsr_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 9:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/msr: Switch rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() to return a 64-bit quantity Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 8:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 8:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/msr: Switch all callers of rdmsrq_safe_on_cpu() to use rdmsr_safe_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/msr: Switch wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() to use a 64-bit quantity Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 7:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/msr: Switch all callers of wrmsrq_safe_on_cpu() to use wrmsr_safe_on_cpu() Juergen Gross
2026-06-05 8:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 9:05 ` [PATCH 0/8] x86/msr: Drop 32-bit variants of *_on_cpu() MSR functions Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 9:13 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-06-05 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 9:40 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
2026-06-05 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 9:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2026-06-05 10:05 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-06-05 10:06 ` Jürgen Groß
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7e799a6-1f1a-49ef-8aac-0d5fd4a06dc7@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome