Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/491] 5.10.253-rc1 review

["Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>]

On 4/13/26 08:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.253 release.
> There are 491 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:57:08 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.253-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

I took the 5.10 stable-queue as of commit
586b5ceef9af2e2148a3811f0c4814688b38b85c
("drop 4 mmc patches from queue-5.10 based on RC review feedback"),
and applied it on top of 5.10.252. This is up to date with most of the
patch drops after 5.10.253-rc1. I then tested the resulting kernel on my
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 1. It works well and I have not observed any
regressions.

Tested-by: Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>

(As of this writing, stable-queue is now up to commit
e84a934b1e8f2f35890b51c6521a7b8678ebdc8f
("drop 1 patch from queue-5.15 and queue-5.10 based on RC review feedback")
and a few more patches were dropped from cw1200 and omap-ocp2scp. However,
the config I used for testing does not build either of those drivers,
so I don't think it really changes anything compared to what I tested.)

-- 
-Barry K. Nathan  <barryn@pobox.com>