From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Wei Wei <dotweiba@gmail.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tuntap: properly align skb->head before building skb
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:03:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7fd16db-2a74-1341-ddd7-0be73376b9ab@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKoQ2rFryuuXeo11DkSRvZPQvhiWhLJvthAnXU2R=gcKA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2017年10月26日 22:11, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>> An unaligned alloc_frag->offset caused by previous allocation will
>> result an unaligned skb->head. This will lead unaligned
>> skb_shared_info and then unaligned dataref which requires to be
>> aligned for accessing on some architecture. Fix this by aligning
>> alloc_frag->offset before the frag refilling.
>>
>> Fixes: 0bbd7dad34f8 ("tun: make tun_build_skb() thread safe")
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Wei Wei <dotweiba@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Reported-by: Wei Wei <dotweiba@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> - The patch is needed for -stable.
>> - Wei, can you try this patch to see if it solves your issue?
>> ---
>> drivers/net/tun.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> index b9973fb..60e44f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>> @@ -1286,6 +1286,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_build_skb(struct tun_struct *tun,
>> buflen += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len + pad);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>> + alloc_frag->offset = ALIGN((u64)alloc_frag->offset, TUN_RX_PAD);
> You have to align to one cache line (SMP_CACHE_BYTES), or SKB_DATA_ALIGN(1)
Oh right.
> Then eventually use skb_reserve() for NET_IP_ALIGN, but I guess it is
> already done.
Yes.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-26 12:15 Jason Wang
2017-10-26 14:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-10-27 3:03 ` Jason Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7fd16db-2a74-1341-ddd7-0be73376b9ab@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dotweiba@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®