mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] staging: rtl8192e: Remove function rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 23:46:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b801f1f9ff3c58aedab4e3e07b2ec0a816fdf5d9.1678740713.git.philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1678740713.git.philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>

Remove function rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path that will always return 1. Reason
is that the eRFPath is always 0 for RF90_PATH_A or 1 for RF90_PATH_B but
never 2 or 3. In most usage cases this is easy to see but for the
following functions that use rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path it is more
difficult:
rtl92e_set_rf_reg and rtl92e_get_rf_reg are used in:
rtl92e_set_bandwidth (eRFPath only for 0 and 1)
rtl92e_config_rf (eRFPath only for 0 and 1)
_rtl92e_phy_switch_channel_step (eRFPath only for 0 and 1)
_rtl92e_dm_check_tx_power_tracking_thermal (eRFPath only for 0)
rtl92e_check_bb_and_rf is used in:
rtl92e_config_rf (eRFPath only for 0 and 1)
_rtl92e_bb_config_para_file (eRFPath only for 0)
rtl92e_config_rf_path is used in:
rtl92e_config_rf (eRFPath only for 0 and 1)
Remove dead code.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
---
 .../staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8190P_rtl8256.c |  6 ------
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c |  2 --
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c | 18 ------------------
 drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.h |  1 -
 4 files changed, 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8190P_rtl8256.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8190P_rtl8256.c
index ecbcf0d5bb68..bb4539e337c8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8190P_rtl8256.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8190P_rtl8256.c
@@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ void rtl92e_set_bandwidth(struct net_device *dev,
 	}
 
 	for (eRFPath = 0; eRFPath < priv->num_total_rf_path; eRFPath++) {
-		if (!rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path(dev, eRFPath))
-			continue;
-
 		switch (bandwidth) {
 		case HT_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20:
 			rtl92e_set_rf_reg(dev, (enum rf90_radio_path)eRFPath,
@@ -67,9 +64,6 @@ bool rtl92e_config_rf(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	for (eRFPath = (enum rf90_radio_path)RF90_PATH_A;
 	     eRFPath < priv->num_total_rf_path; eRFPath++) {
-		if (!rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path(dev, eRFPath))
-			continue;
-
 		pPhyReg = &priv->phy_reg_def[eRFPath];
 
 		switch (eRFPath) {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
index fb4eede0470a..1e7be321721b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c
@@ -1515,8 +1515,6 @@ static void _rtl92e_process_phyinfo(struct r8192_priv *priv, u8 *buffer,
 
 	if (!prev_st->bIsCCK && prev_st->bPacketToSelf) {
 		for (rfpath = RF90_PATH_A; rfpath < priv->num_total_rf_path; rfpath++) {
-			if (!rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path(priv->rtllib->dev, rfpath))
-				continue;
 			if (priv->stats.rx_rssi_percentage[rfpath] == 0) {
 				priv->stats.rx_rssi_percentage[rfpath] =
 					 prev_st->RxMIMOSignalStrength[rfpath];
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
index e3886db3bfbb..51a20379dca0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.c
@@ -47,20 +47,6 @@ static u32 _rtl92e_calculate_bit_shift(u32 dwBitMask)
 	return ffs(dwBitMask) - 1;
 }
 
-u8 rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path(struct net_device *dev, u32 eRFPath)
-{
-	u8 ret = 1;
-	struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
-
-	if (priv->rf_type == RF_1T2R) {
-		if (eRFPath == RF90_PATH_A || eRFPath == RF90_PATH_B)
-			ret = 1;
-		else if (eRFPath == RF90_PATH_C || eRFPath == RF90_PATH_D)
-			ret = 0;
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-
 void rtl92e_set_bb_reg(struct net_device *dev, u32 dwRegAddr, u32 dwBitMask,
 		       u32 dwData)
 {
@@ -196,8 +182,6 @@ void rtl92e_set_rf_reg(struct net_device *dev, enum rf90_radio_path eRFPath,
 	struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
 	u32 Original_Value, BitShift, New_Value;
 
-	if (!rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path(dev, eRFPath))
-		return;
 	if (priv->rtllib->rf_power_state != rf_on && !priv->being_init_adapter)
 		return;
 
@@ -233,8 +217,6 @@ u32 rtl92e_get_rf_reg(struct net_device *dev, enum rf90_radio_path eRFPath,
 	u32 Original_Value, Readback_Value, BitShift;
 	struct r8192_priv *priv = rtllib_priv(dev);
 
-	if (!rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path(dev, eRFPath))
-		return 0;
 	if (priv->rtllib->rf_power_state != rf_on && !priv->being_init_adapter)
 		return	0;
 	mutex_lock(&priv->rf_mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.h
index ac640033e843..f1d183ed7ca4 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_phy.h
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ enum rf90_radio_path {
 #define bMaskLWord                0x0000ffff
 #define bMaskDWord                0xffffffff
 
-u8 rtl92e_is_legal_rf_path(struct net_device *dev, u32 eRFPath);
 void rtl92e_set_bb_reg(struct net_device *dev, u32 dwRegAddr,
 		       u32 dwBitMask, u32 dwData);
 u32 rtl92e_get_bb_reg(struct net_device *dev, u32 dwRegAddr, u32 dwBitMask);
-- 
2.39.2


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-13 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-13 22:46 [PATCH 0/2] staging: rtl8192e: Remove unused RF90_PATH_C and ..D Philipp Hortmann
2023-03-13 22:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8192e: Replace RF90_PATH_C in test expression of for loop Philipp Hortmann
2023-03-13 22:46 ` Philipp Hortmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b801f1f9ff3c58aedab4e3e07b2ec0a816fdf5d9.1678740713.git.philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
    --to=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®