mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Szyprowski,
	Marek" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] mmc: dw_mmc: simplify optional reset handling
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:03:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b80ceee9-40e7-f32b-d44a-00dd4e7f6461@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490003602.2917.16.camel@pengutronix.de>

Hi Philipp,

On 20.03.2017 10:53, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 10:22 +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Hi Philipp,
>>
>> Todays next branch does not work with exynos5433-tm2 board.
>> I guess this patch causes regression. On MMC without reset controller I
>> get errors:
>> [    4.938222] dwmmc_exynos 15540000.mshc: platform data not available
>> [    4.943268] dwmmc_exynos: probe of 15540000.mshc failed with error -22
>> [    4.950184] dwmmc_exynos 15560000.mshc: platform data not available
>> [    4.955962] dwmmc_exynos: probe of 15560000.mshc failed with error -22
>>
>> Commenting out reset controller get and error checks 'fixes' the issue.
>>
>> On 15.03.2017 12:31, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>>> As of commit bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really
>>> optional"), the reset framework API calls use NULL pointers to describe
>>> optional, non-present reset controls.
>>>
>>> This allows to return errors from devm_reset_control_get_optional and to
>>> call reset_control_(de)assert unconditionally.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 14 +++++---------
>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> index a9ac0b4573131..3d62b0a1f81cb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>>> @@ -2968,10 +2968,8 @@ static struct dw_mci_board *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>  
>>>  	/* find reset controller when exist */
>>>  	pdata->rstc = devm_reset_control_get_optional(dev, "reset");
>>> -	if (IS_ERR(pdata->rstc)) {
>>> -		if (PTR_ERR(pdata->rstc) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> -			return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>>> -	}
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(pdata->rstc))
>>> +		return ERR_CAST(pdata->rstc);
>>
>> With three lines above commented out it works.
> So devm_reset_control_get_optional returns -EINVAL. Why?
>
> The mshc@15560000 node is compatible to "samsung,exynos7-dw-mshc-smu",
> so that's dw_mmc-exynos.c calling dw_mci_pltfm_register, which then
> calls dw_mci_probe, passing the original platform device as
> host->dev = &pdev->dev, and I expect __of_reset_control_get being called
> with a valid DT node (dev->of_node).
> Since id is set to "reset", of_property_match_string(node,
> "reset-names", id) should then be called and return -EINVAL because the
> "reset-names" property does not exist. Then __of_reset_control_get
> should return NULL because optional == true.
> Some of this obviously doesn't happen, where am I wrong?


When RESET_CONTROLLER is not enabled dummy stubs return -ENOSUPP error [1].

[1]: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/reset.h#L77

Regards
Andrzej




>
> regards
> Philipp
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-20 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15 11:31 Philipp Zabel
2017-03-16 14:46 ` Ulf Hansson
     [not found] ` <CGME20170320092255eucas1p1459c023fd9b479c8e5323a6ac97dbf58@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2017-03-20  9:22   ` Andrzej Hajda
2017-03-20  9:53     ` Philipp Zabel
2017-03-20 10:03       ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2017-03-20 10:27         ` Philipp Zabel
2017-03-20 10:49           ` Andrzej Hajda
2017-03-20 11:00             ` Philipp Zabel
2017-03-20 18:09               ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-20 18:10               ` Ulf Hansson
2017-03-21 12:12                 ` Jaehoon Chung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b80ceee9-40e7-f32b-d44a-00dd4e7f6461@samsung.com \
    --to=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®