mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Hellström (VMware)" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pv-drivers@vmware.com,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Doug Covelli <dcovelli@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/vmware: Add a header file for hypercall definitions
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:19:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b82e190e-6887-b95a-a99a-176f22c57b7b@shipmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190827154422.GG29752@zn.tnic>

On 8/27/19 5:44 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:13:14AM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * The high bandwidth out call. The low word of edx is presumed to have the
>> + * HB and OUT bits set.
>> + */
>> +#define VMWARE_HYPERCALL_HB_OUT						\
>> +	ALTERNATIVE_2("movw $" VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_PORT_HB ", %%dx; rep outsb", \
> Hmm, that looks fishy:
>
> This call in vmw_port_hb_out(), for example, gets converted to the asm
> below (I've left in the asm touching only rDX).
>
> # drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c:160:              VMW_PORT_HB_OUT(
> #NO_APP
>          movzwl  0(%rbp), %edx   # channel_20(D)->channel_id, channel_20(D)->channel_id
>
> 	...
>
>          sall    $16, %edx       #, tmp172
>          orl     $3, %edx        #, tmp173
>
> this is adding channel_id and flags:
>
>                          VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_HB | (channel->channel_id << 16) |
>                          VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_OUT,
>
> the $3 being (VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_HB | VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_OUT).
>
>          movslq  %edx, %rdx      # tmp173, tmp174
>
> Here it is sign-extending it.
>
> #APP
> # 160 "drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_msg.c" 1
>          push %rbp;mov %r8, %rbp;# ALT: oldinstr2        # bp
> 661:
>          movw $0x5659, %dx; rep outsb
>
> And now here you're overwriting the low word of %edx. And now it
> contains:
>
> 0x[channel_id]5659
>
> and the low word doesn't contain the 3, i.e., (VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_HB |
> VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_OUT) anymore. And that's before you do the hypercall
> so I'm guessing that cannot be right.
>
> Or?
>
It should be correct. The flags VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_HB and 
VMWARE_HYPERVISOR_OUT are only valid for the vmcall / vmmcall versions.

For the legacy version, the direction is toggled by the instruction (in 
vs out) and LB vs HB is toggled by the port number (0x5658 vs 0x5659)

So in essence the low word definition of %edx is different in the two 
versions. I've chosen to use the new vmcall/vmmcall definition in the 
driver code.

/Thomas


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-27 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-23  8:13 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for updated vmware hypercall instruction Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-08-23  8:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/vmware: Update platform detection code for VMCALL/VMMCALL hypercalls Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-08-27 12:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-27 19:19     ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-08-27 19:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-28  7:45     ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-08-28  8:45       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-23  8:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/vmware: Add a header file for hypercall definitions Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-08-27 13:10   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-27 15:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-27 19:19     ` Thomas Hellström (VMware) [this message]
2019-08-27 19:54       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-23  8:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/vmwgfx: Update the backdoor call with support for new instructions Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-08-26 20:12   ` Dave Airlie
2019-08-23  8:13 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] input/vmmouse: " Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2019-08-27  8:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for updated vmware hypercall instruction Thomas Hellström (VMware)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b82e190e-6887-b95a-a99a-176f22c57b7b@shipmail.org \
    --to=thomas_os@shipmail.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dcovelli@vmware.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®