From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD54C433F5 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 02:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234352AbiBJCAX (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 21:00:23 -0500 Received: from gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com ([23.128.96.19]:60222 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234503AbiBJB7U (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Feb 2022 20:59:20 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8172BB0A for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:49:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1644457748; x=1675993748; h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A1arXDdvviAbJmFHB0JiZO8bM7BMFQsEYKo+h0boyLo=; b=FiYj4PBKlEb7PaQUxDrL13qDVvEbPRDti4Mzgsjkvy6w77u2q/KSbuoB s1ruyLif2giCPHdhWmqiQAxvri5x7dBDnWxbq7xMXvOiplESPv2ZfEa0V RZdz2BKJqE/K70EnUZAgHghX5C505nBpPZG4dywmLXhiAtiKYA4FubXYM 4XgYXijLDJNTfkSQmOs3BuKac5uPgi4i/vla5BqjBPAwRHixvzonT/s36 PAbf49HnmzjPR1hAPQbMet6J3lLtFTPWWtvMRRmoMDIXQES6xttUyuty2 NxNYemmzAlYIyjYoP7aeJU7ykYin7fEDO3GJAVneRB5m2vF8RpUeDbnS5 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10253"; a="249585930" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,357,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="249585930" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2022 16:45:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,357,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="678966591" Received: from allen-box.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.118]) ([10.239.159.118]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2022 16:45:46 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:44:34 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel , Christoph Hellwig , Ben Skeggs , Kevin Tian , Ashok Raj , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Alex Williamson , Eric Auger , Liu Yi L , Jacob jun Pan , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Remove guest pasid related interfaces and definitions Content-Language: en-US To: Jason Gunthorpe References: <20220208012559.1121729-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20220208012559.1121729-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20220209132954.GT4160@nvidia.com> From: Lu Baolu In-Reply-To: <20220209132954.GT4160@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jason, On 2/9/22 9:29 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h >> index 59178fc229ca..65d8b0234f69 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h >> @@ -158,185 +158,4 @@ struct iommu_page_response { >> __u32 code; >> }; > What is the plan for the rest of the dead code in this file? The remaining code are IOMMU fault related. I can look into them in a separated series where I plan to make the I/O page fault framework generic. Best regards, baolu