From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753218AbdEEPEw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 5 May 2017 11:04:52 -0400
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:65092 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752632AbdEEPEu (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 5 May 2017 11:04:50 -0400
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-STI: Fine-tuning for some function implementations
To: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com>,
        Vincent Abriou <vincent.abriou@st.com>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <f4a1bd89-50c4-ea2d-ea70-de5209b8a55a@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20170505140916.zoe4sxe3xjtvdlag@art_vandelay>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <b859d1fb-bdf2-1738-8f28-28a31419b0d1@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 17:04:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170505140916.zoe4sxe3xjtvdlag@art_vandelay>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JrtjxHYHj8vtcFeauwaCJu4rzYy0Bf/BHCLjFTC0rcesm6SN0cz
 QsYrEMsNOFB2JtlHA1q7af9qHMrlL4Yq2Zidnza2ZWtjokMXm9hfal8f5zRgy6rQd7qOdNw
 tgFRbWXYOAcemxKQJ8LdtNM1YxK+VcgKHarFWEKnfi6ObC4lk7bHI+fDZ2YHrJQHkQ3lwjI
 BjBeZTLja1UtTacq8pDsg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:qPgZTHLHHMc=:wVDJR5HS4joF3ZIV5OGaRf
 bEUgPWg4wXO1+yh9kVE1x1zG7wIOxyjARvT4yaNi3e/tpn5+VZJThEiTUEodexafhisid0KVQ
 4Rm44KcbIC7gybPlBaHimYKLQ61Pg6URExmEoRY44XY9jesEmi+ujGNhWek9/2N3VS1cWuJUF
 mxdZtwL7Q3JyaQDS/ZY2gETHdbIMT/xwxOYwLrfxRlt2hXsYFG8aUHEqEerCdcvtSSS3B+3d1
 nEHK6FoheyVSg8GPjUvjFlDfQxd6NBKz+vdL3ZjiUnvYj647qiHIa3mvcz8dYZzJCzqNYeEln
 h3y5ChXtZH1g+2XBVca4EuELcKanD9PFFAUw27s22iESWBpL4zMEZVbENT3NnsFBQ7YOBHWL4
 ClPF8vpKLRA0Ox7JydVhNBMljxUO8d3svwh/4Y6Aux+ntYh+2MRhQPnYdp0ztwsj8lUvDfpRr
 MC665pyD7LgnrxiFnUlKpkUUCKj1hA9geK4N1URmQ8jm+ZV+w20G21bzy50sCj3oU25jqgyyM
 s8jJyqHbS6y5z0UeYyylDJCblIKE8TMflSsvqOt6PnaBFS4arkXIE6hlYDVotG9TGHgA8f0mL
 cIMh5DrWwH2L+87wuAA5V/2Qe+a88cp6QE5HjEO6VepZbU+RKAJfLYyhncsCGo4LE7FFFsxHU
 /I0sxJNdNp6q5yyBEIl39SIp4oz2AiEuWhVvoNcANHaJ9kVN6HpzooDIkV6npo8bdbUeJ23aK
 eHdEi7MnoV7C4HGvNgUnnOiOcKHUMmeu1n8VDJ30wU8pShcEUqgWyFmFJ0x6086BuI27Gev/V
 JHu1HR6
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> It seems like you're back to submitting cocci patches again :)

My contribution activities are varying also for Linux software over time.   ;-)

The corresponding source code search patterns get different popularity.


> I don't want to waste your time by ignoring your patches, so please ensure that
> your patches provide value and that they are tested.

Which benchmarks and system tests would you find representative for this patch series?

How do you think generally about the proposed change possibilities?

Regards,
Markus