From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:17:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8670e11-61d4-4831-8a21-2dda3c5db131@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017194415.GA11717@sol.localdomain>
On 10/17/24 9:44 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 04:27:48PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> Add a new device-mapper target "dm-inlinecrypt" that is similar to
>> dm-crypt but uses the blk-crypto API instead of the regular crypto API.
>> This allows it to take advantage of inline encryption hardware such as
>> that commonly built into UFS host controllers.
>
> A slight difference in behavior vs. dm-crypt that I just became aware of:
> dm-crypt allows XTS keys whose first half equals the second half, i.e.
> cipher key == tweak key. dm-inlinecrypt typically will not allow this. Inline
> encryption hardware typically rejects such keys, and blk-crypto-fallback rejects
> them too because it uses CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_FORBID_WEAK_KEYS.
>
> IMO, rejecting these weak keys is desirable, and the fact that dm-inlinecrypt
> fixes this issue with dm-crypt will just need to be documented.
Hm, I thought this is already rejected in crypto API (at least in FIPS mode)...
It should be rejected exactly as you described even for dm-crypt,
just the check should be (IMO) part of crypto API (set keys), not dm-crypt itself.
And here I think we should not be backward "compatible" as it is security issue,
both XTS keys just must not be the same.
Milan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-16 23:27 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] " Eric Biggers
2024-10-16 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] block: export blk-crypto symbols required by dm-inlinecrypt Eric Biggers
2024-10-16 23:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] dm-inlinecrypt: add target for inline block device encryption Eric Biggers
2024-10-17 19:44 ` Eric Biggers
2024-10-17 20:17 ` Milan Broz [this message]
2024-10-17 20:28 ` Eric Biggers
2024-10-17 21:03 ` Milan Broz
2024-10-18 2:52 ` Adrian Vovk
2024-10-18 17:33 ` Eric Biggers
2025-07-11 5:30 ` Md Sadre Alam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8670e11-61d4-4831-8a21-2dda3c5db131@gmail.com \
--to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_mdalam@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®