mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Improve validation of expected SoC naming
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:05:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8784516-fa22-4602-93d8-9c5e4e255414@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519-dt-bindings-qcom-soc-naming-v1-0-005d29d261ae@oss.qualcomm.com>

On 5/19/26 10:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The schema checking for expected naming patterns for SoC IP block nodes
> was really incomplete and was checking only nodes with single
> compatible.  Improve that because questions about expected compatibles
> still appear, e.g. we have
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-x1e80100.yaml with:
> 
> - qcom,pcie-x1e80100 (expected old legacy style)
> - qcom,glymur-pcie (change to new style, ok fine, let's switch to new
>   style... but...)
> 
> I am afraid that a new SoC will revert that back to old style, e.g.:
> qcom,pcie-whatever-new-soc
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> ---
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (3):
>       dt-bindings: arm: qcoms-c: Include Eliza, Kaanapali and others in SoC names
			      ^^^ typo

Konrad

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-20 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-19 20:03 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 20:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcoms-c: Include Eliza, Kaanapali and others in SoC names Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-20 10:05   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-20 10:53     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 20:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document more of existing legacy style compatibles Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-20 10:04   ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-20 10:55     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 20:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Validate nodes with fallbacks Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 23:56   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-05-20 10:05 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b8784516-fa22-4602-93d8-9c5e4e255414@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®