From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Improve validation of expected SoC naming
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:05:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8784516-fa22-4602-93d8-9c5e4e255414@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519-dt-bindings-qcom-soc-naming-v1-0-005d29d261ae@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 5/19/26 10:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The schema checking for expected naming patterns for SoC IP block nodes
> was really incomplete and was checking only nodes with single
> compatible. Improve that because questions about expected compatibles
> still appear, e.g. we have
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-x1e80100.yaml with:
>
> - qcom,pcie-x1e80100 (expected old legacy style)
> - qcom,glymur-pcie (change to new style, ok fine, let's switch to new
> style... but...)
>
> I am afraid that a new SoC will revert that back to old style, e.g.:
> qcom,pcie-whatever-new-soc
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> ---
> Krzysztof Kozlowski (3):
> dt-bindings: arm: qcoms-c: Include Eliza, Kaanapali and others in SoC names
^^^ typo
Konrad
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 20:03 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 20:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcoms-c: Include Eliza, Kaanapali and others in SoC names Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-20 10:05 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-20 10:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 20:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Document more of existing legacy style compatibles Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-20 10:04 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-20 10:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 20:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: Validate nodes with fallbacks Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-05-19 23:56 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-05-20 10:05 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8784516-fa22-4602-93d8-9c5e4e255414@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®