Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Correct nr_types assignment for TPS6594/3 and TPS65224

["Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>]

Please ignore below response .

Sent by mistake.


Thanks

Udit


On 6/3/2024 10:46 PM, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>
> On 6/3/2024 10:35 PM, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
>> Swap nr_types assignment for TPS6594/3 and TPS65224.
>> Issue detected with v6.10-rc1 and tested using a TI J7200 EVM board.
>
>
> Please prefix line, where you want this patch to go
>
> like tiL6.6 or so
>
>
>> Log:
>> [   13.974024] Call trace:
>> [   13.974025]  _regulator_put.part.0+0x40/0x48
>> [   13.974028]  regulator_register+0x2b0/0xa00
>> [   13.974031]  devm_regulator_register+0x58/0xa0
>> [   13.974035]  tps6594_regulator_probe+0x4e0/0x5f0 [tps6594_regulator]
>> ...
>> [   13.974178] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 
>> virtual address 0000000000000004
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c 
>> b/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c
>> index 4a859f4c0f83..b66608ab2546 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps6594-regulator.c
>> @@ -660,11 +660,11 @@ static int tps6594_regulator_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       } else if (tps->chip_id == TPS65224) {
>>           nr_buck = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65224_buck_regs);
>>           nr_ldo = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65224_ldo_regs);
>> -        nr_types = REGS_INT_NB;
>> +        nr_types = TPS65224_REGS_INT_NB;
>>       } else {
>>           nr_buck = ARRAY_SIZE(buck_regs);
>>           nr_ldo = ARRAY_SIZE(tps6594_ldo_regs);
>> -        nr_types = TPS65224_REGS_INT_NB;
>> +        nr_types = REGS_INT_NB;
>>       }
>>         reg_irq_nb = nr_types * (nr_buck + nr_ldo);
>> --