From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C33C433EF for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA1D61371 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230510AbhJTMrd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:47:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55576 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230447AbhJTMrG (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:47:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A37FC061753; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id d9so2878799pfl.6; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yyWIeD3i9WahRcz0ArlWA7aLt2M5TmzmbUQm2c2ABac=; b=osvHtzEQaUSIgQ+5TW2kFqmhU7DTyHXW13DjYTPWkeKcXJbSOltHkYB2aVxd3tu4ae Ree1mWZ27PMcyVdk/yUTt0iM+dUHpaConpD2uCs6hSdYnMBbZRG/bMW4epO98wONZqTa +SCiwzviYDc2mt6lNYI2kY3SN1ZPTjKAZnoza9EFbs74kPwmUE5oa8zS6tk4bu6bMLJd icBUEDIWP5e8pvIibZGoNIXW4Y9IuESIkjpqNOaeR4l/VWxwDecZEVDG0AhakIkM/0wk VcR296nF+P5NXqpfTBCRZ+YGMoNWM0Z7vUw+7rW6lF8mu/o8eckxpFVl0FIHOZvkRLfe RIsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yyWIeD3i9WahRcz0ArlWA7aLt2M5TmzmbUQm2c2ABac=; b=vGzRMRx3ZUtYtYAii5MucvrD4hgqA3zb+OQzdDIneOAIb3aU8GdrjPl4PXrm91HJVk +PQ933Q/dqbkxZbJR9WWONllrsAxnyO5PP9eBU+6sCpuH+HPN83rOLc6Ki5dXReDibVo /54hfwHzA8klYGBR9gOUUZkTPmvF0A0IA0k8hV5p7o4pSFHOqlq3+wTk7i4oamGWhyL3 0dN4EKySJicbbP5IsFp1+oLgU89c+Pj/VWgLu0TNZoDvf13ll0RaV1i/rqK0R6cHiNzB CoLFydXxr7U6lu4hXgM+d3/kL94i+9f4euelfeUeqfcMMReUFtZmgy9WIMsVUw0Bl9E4 UBzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QwFflJgN+lOiRFyCPCmQSA0H/QXBA8X/mPG4Gfu8qyq5AEyyg pZbqlLYcAoQSd4ucC1Te+68= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwRky6RP6pTJ7x3IlNFf1UhIyZWGl8fIItdeYH/giK7DJt9lv86LhmSCihuRBiCaer4sv2MQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:d11e:0:b0:446:d705:7175 with SMTP id z30-20020a62d11e000000b00446d7057175mr6288265pfg.74.1634733892023; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2400:4052:6980:3800:dba7:2b1f:3f26:a5ec? ([2400:4052:6980:3800:dba7:2b1f:3f26:a5ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11sm2264932pge.48.2021.10.20.05.44.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 05:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] various fixes for atomisp to make it work From: Tsuchiya Yuto To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Hans de Goede , Patrik Gfeller , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Yang Yingliang , Hans Verkuil , Aline Santana Cordeiro , Dinghao Liu , Alan , Linux Media Mailing List , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:44:47 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20211020075015.316d827c@sal.lan> References: <20211017161958.44351-1-kitakar@gmail.com> <20211020075015.316d827c@sal.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2021-10-20 at 07:50 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:56:40 +0300 > Andy Shevchenko escreveu: > > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 6:45 AM Tsuchiya Yuto wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This patch series contains fixes for atomisp to work (again). Tested on > > > Microsoft Surface 3 (Windows) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 (Android model) with > > > v5.15-rc5. Both are Cherry Trail (ISP2401) devices. > > > > > > I'm still not used to Linux patch sending flow. Sorry in advance > > > if there is some weirdness :-) but I did my best. > > > > I agree with Hans, you did an excellent job! > > I will try to find time to look into this. Thank you :) > > In any case it seems to me > > that this is a material more likely for v5.17-rc1, rather than v5.16. > > Yeah, it sounds to late to apply it for 5.16. I see, but no problem. This series does not contain any fixes for critical issues (like NULL ptr deref) Regards, Tsuchiya Yuto