From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:39:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b92ba5eb-b4b1-4f2d-f265-28889a907145@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475885497-6094-6-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com>
Op 08-10-16 om 02:11 schreef Lyude:
> Now that we've make skl_wm_levels make a little more sense, we can
> remove all of the redundant wm information. Up until now we'd been
> storing two copies of all of the skl watermarks: one being the
> skl_pipe_wm structs, the other being the global wm struct in
> drm_i915_private containing the raw register values. This is confusing
> and problematic, since it means we're prone to accidentally letting the
> two copies go out of sync. So, get rid of all of the functions
> responsible for computing the register values and just use a single
> helper, skl_write_wm_level(), to convert and write the new watermarks on
> the fly.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Fixup skl_write_wm_level()
> - Fixup skl_wm_level_from_reg_val()
> - Don't forget to copy *active to intel_crtc->wm.active.skl
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 204 ++++++++++++-----------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 8 +-
> 5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 0287c93..76583b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1644,8 +1644,6 @@ struct skl_ddb_allocation {
> struct skl_wm_values {
> unsigned dirty_pipes;
> struct skl_ddb_allocation ddb;
> - uint32_t plane[I915_MAX_PIPES][I915_MAX_PLANES][8];
> - uint32_t plane_trans[I915_MAX_PIPES][I915_MAX_PLANES];
> };
>
> struct skl_wm_level {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index a71d05a..39400a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -3378,6 +3378,8 @@ static void skylake_update_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->base.fb;
> const struct skl_wm_values *wm = &dev_priv->wm.skl_results;
> + const struct skl_plane_wm *p_wm =
> + &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[0];
> int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> u32 plane_ctl;
> unsigned int rotation = plane_state->base.rotation;
> @@ -3414,7 +3416,7 @@ static void skylake_update_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
> intel_crtc->adjusted_y = src_y;
>
> if (wm->dirty_pipes & drm_crtc_mask(&intel_crtc->base))
> - skl_write_plane_wm(intel_crtc, wm, 0);
> + skl_write_plane_wm(intel_crtc, p_wm, &wm->ddb, 0);
>
> I915_WRITE(PLANE_CTL(pipe, 0), plane_ctl);
> I915_WRITE(PLANE_OFFSET(pipe, 0), (src_y << 16) | src_x);
> @@ -3448,6 +3450,8 @@ static void skylake_disable_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *primary,
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> + struct intel_crtc_state *cstate = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> + const struct skl_plane_wm *p_wm = &cstate->wm.skl.optimal.planes[0];
> int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
>
> /*
> @@ -3455,7 +3459,8 @@ static void skylake_disable_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *primary,
> * plane's visiblity isn't actually changing neither is its watermarks.
> */
> if (!crtc->primary->state->visible)
> - skl_write_plane_wm(intel_crtc, &dev_priv->wm.skl_results, 0);
> + skl_write_plane_wm(intel_crtc, p_wm,
> + &dev_priv->wm.skl_results.ddb, 0);
>
> I915_WRITE(PLANE_CTL(pipe, 0), 0);
> I915_WRITE(PLANE_SURF(pipe, 0), 0);
> @@ -10819,12 +10824,15 @@ static void i9xx_update_cursor(struct drm_crtc *crtc, u32 base,
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> + struct intel_crtc_state *cstate = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> const struct skl_wm_values *wm = &dev_priv->wm.skl_results;
> + const struct skl_plane_wm *p_wm =
> + &cstate->wm.skl.optimal.planes[PLANE_CURSOR];
> int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> uint32_t cntl = 0;
>
> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 && wm->dirty_pipes & drm_crtc_mask(crtc))
> - skl_write_cursor_wm(intel_crtc, wm);
> + skl_write_cursor_wm(intel_crtc, p_wm, &wm->ddb);
>
> if (plane_state && plane_state->base.visible) {
> cntl = MCURSOR_GAMMA_ENABLE;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index d684f4f..958dc72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1765,9 +1765,11 @@ bool skl_ddb_allocation_equals(const struct skl_ddb_allocation *old,
> bool skl_ddb_allocation_overlaps(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc);
> void skl_write_cursor_wm(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - const struct skl_wm_values *wm);
> + const struct skl_plane_wm *wm,
> + const struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb);
> void skl_write_plane_wm(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> - const struct skl_wm_values *wm,
> + const struct skl_plane_wm *wm,
> + const struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
> int plane);
> uint32_t ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
> bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 5dbaf12..5cb537c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3000,6 +3000,8 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> + struct intel_crtc_state *cstate;
> + struct skl_plane_wm *wm;
> enum pipe pipe;
> int level, plane;
>
> @@ -3020,18 +3022,21 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> /* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */
> pipe = ffs(intel_state->active_crtcs) - 1;
> crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
> + cstate = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, to_intel_crtc(crtc));
Wrong cstate here, should be crtc->state since it's committed and crtc_state is the old state.
~Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-08 0:11 [PATCH v2 00/10] Start of skl watermark cleanup Lyude
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/i915/skl: Move per-pipe ddb allocations into crtc states Lyude
2016-10-11 19:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/i915/skl: Remove linetime from skl_wm_values Lyude
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_wm_level per-plane Lyude
2016-10-11 19:36 ` Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/gen9: Cleanup skl_pipe_wm_active_state Lyude
2016-10-11 19:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values Lyude
2016-10-13 13:39 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2016-10-13 20:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-13 20:07 ` Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-13 21:25 ` Lyude Paul
2016-10-17 6:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-10-17 8:07 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/gen9: Add ddb changes to atomic debug output Lyude
2016-10-13 20:17 ` Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state() reusable Lyude
2016-10-13 20:36 ` Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/gen9: Add skl_wm_level_equals() Lyude
2016-10-13 20:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gen9: Actually verify WM levels in verify_wm_state() Lyude
2016-10-13 21:15 ` Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-13 21:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paulo Zanoni
2016-10-08 0:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/gen9: Don't wrap strings " Lyude
2016-10-13 21:18 ` Paulo Zanoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b92ba5eb-b4b1-4f2d-f265-28889a907145@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=cpaul@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®