mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:00:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b98a0890-dbe1-42c9-a43e-2f30a06ca21c@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250327234629.3953536-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com>



On 28.03.25 г. 1:46 ч., Sohil Mehta wrote:
> While reworking the NMI-source patches[1], I spent quite a few days
> understanding the existing NMI handling code. The intention of this series is
> to fix the inconsistencies and redundancies that I encountered.
> 
> This series also includes improved documentation to make the code easier to
> follow. It does not introduce any significant functional changes.
> 
> I have tried to split the patches logically to make them easier to review. Let
> me know if some of them should be combined. The patches are in no particular
> order and can be picked up independently.
> 
> The documentation updates in patches (5, 6, 7) are to the best of my ability.
> However, I would really appreciate extra eyes to ensure it is precise.
> 
> The updated NMI-source patches will follow this series sometime later.
> 
> @Ingo, I tried to format the commit references the way you prefer:
> 
>    Commit:
>      feeaf5512947 ("x86: Move sysctls into arch/x86")
> 
> However, checkpatch seems to dislike it, so I reformatted them as below:
> 
>    Commit feeaf5512947 ("x86: Move sysctls into arch/x86")
> 
> Is there a specific guideline for x86?
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240709143906.1040477-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> 
> Sohil Mehta (9):
>    x86/nmi: Simplify unknown NMI panic handling
>    x86/nmi: Consolidate NMI panic variables
>    x86/nmi: Use a macro to initialize NMI descriptors
>    x86/nmi: Remove export of local_touch_nmi()
>    x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown NMI handling
>    x86/nmi: Improve and relocate NMI handler comments
>    x86/nmi: Improve NMI header documentation
>    x86/nmi: Clean up NMI selftest
>    x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console print
> 
>   arch/x86/include/asm/nmi.h      | 49 +++++++++++++++++--
>   arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h |  1 +
>   arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c     |  2 -
>   arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c           | 87 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c  | 52 ++++++--------------
>   arch/x86/kernel/setup.c         | 37 ++++++--------
>   include/linux/panic.h           |  2 -
>   7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-01 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-27 23:46 Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/nmi: Simplify unknown NMI panic handling Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:52   ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:01     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 15:00   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-04-01 15:54     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/nmi: Consolidate NMI panic variables Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:43   ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 22:50     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:05       ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:20         ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  1:06           ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-01  5:46             ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  8:08               ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/nmi: Use a macro to initialize NMI descriptors Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:46   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/nmi: Remove export of local_touch_nmi() Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:47   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown NMI handling Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  0:17   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-01  5:28     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  5:45     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-01  5:53       ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown_nmi_error() tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/nmi: Improve and relocate NMI handler comments Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  1:03   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI header documentation Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 10:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-31 16:04     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 21:36       ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  8:08         ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-01 16:11           ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Add missing description x86_platform_ops::get_nmi_reason to <asm/x86_init.h> tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve <asm/nmi.h> documentation tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/nmi: Clean up NMI selftest Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console print Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  0:42   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console printouts tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-01 16:00 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2025-04-02 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b98a0890-dbe1-42c9-a43e-2f30a06ca21c@suse.com \
    --to=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®