From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peternewman@google.com, eranian@google.com,
gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86/resctrl: Fix miscount of bandwidth event when reactivating previously Unavailable RMID
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 11:52:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9a0ac5d-6ccc-45b1-afbf-bdba24aaf501@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c428de8-f8a6-47a1-a5ca-768d1906ed24@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On 10/9/2025 11:19 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 10/9/25 11:29 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Users can create as many monitoring groups as the number of RMIDs supported
>> by the hardware. However, on AMD systems, only a limited number of RMIDs
>> are guaranteed to be actively tracked by the hardware. RMIDs that exceed
>> this limit are placed in an "Unavailable" state. When a bandwidth counter
>> is read for such an RMID, the hardware sets MSR_IA32_QM_CTR.Unavailable
>> (bit 62). When such an RMID starts being tracked again the hardware counter
>> is reset to zero. MSR_IA32_QM_CTR.Unavailable remains set on first read
>> after tracking re-starts and is clear on all subsequent reads as long as
>> the RMID is tracked.
>>
>> resctrl miscounts the bandwidth events after an RMID transitions from the
>> "Unavailable" state back to being tracked. This happens because when the
>> hardware starts counting again after resetting the counter to zero, resctrl
>> in turn compares the new count against the counter value stored from the
>> previous time the RMID was tracked. This results in resctrl computing an
>> event value that is either undercounting (when new counter is more than
>> stored counter) or a mistaken overflow (when new counter is less than
>
> Since there is going to be a respin ... there is a stray tab above.
>
Yes. Thanks
-Babu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-10 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-09 18:29 Babu Moger
2025-10-09 23:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-10-10 1:57 ` Moger, Babu
2025-10-10 4:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-10 16:52 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9a0ac5d-6ccc-45b1-afbf-bdba24aaf501@amd.com \
--to=bmoger@amd.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®