From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: Fix compile time warning on kernel/auditsc.c
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:01:12 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9df5fa10901242201h75f40e40ic27dfb089dd90fc8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32272.1232853509@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On 1/25/09, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>
> Blech. That's abuse of inline. Can you find some other, more kernel-y
> way to address the issue? (Possibly make it an actual inline up in a .h
> file, with a #ifdef wrapping around it, or do something matching what's
> done at the call site (apparently #ifdef'ing code is accepted in that .c
> file, adding another #ifdef around that function to match all the *other*
> '#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE' would be less ugly than 'inline'.
Hi, Valdis. Thanks for your suggestions. Actually without inline-ing
the warning doesn't resolves. So, as you said I moved
audit_set_auditable function into kernel/audit.h, but not #ifdef
wrapping around it rather #ifdef into it. Since wrapping #ifdef
generates same warning few times more. Here is the patch. If I miss
anything, then please notice.
-----
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
--- linux-2.6-orig/kernel/audit.h 2009-01-23 18:28:45.000000000 +0600
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/audit.h 2009-01-25 11:50:22.520217272 +0600
@@ -121,6 +121,16 @@ extern struct mutex audit_filter_mutex;
extern void audit_free_rule_rcu(struct rcu_head *);
extern struct list_head audit_filter_list[];
+static inline void audit_set_auditable(struct audit_context *ctx)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE
+ if (!ctx->prio) {
+ ctx->prio = 1;
+ ctx->current_state = AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT;
+ }
+#endif
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE
extern struct audit_chunk *audit_tree_lookup(const struct inode *);
extern void audit_put_chunk(struct audit_chunk *);
------
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
--- linux-2.6-orig/kernel/auditsc.c 2009-01-23 18:28:45.000000000 +0600
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/auditsc.c 2009-01-25 11:50:25.712731936 +0600
@@ -741,14 +741,6 @@ void audit_filter_inodes(struct task_str
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-static void audit_set_auditable(struct audit_context *ctx)
-{
- if (!ctx->prio) {
- ctx->prio = 1;
- ctx->current_state = AUDIT_RECORD_CONTEXT;
- }
-}
-
static inline struct audit_context *audit_get_context(struct task_struct *tsk,
int return_valid,
int return_code)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-25 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-23 19:50 Rakib Mullick
2009-01-25 3:18 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-25 6:01 ` Rakib Mullick [this message]
2009-01-26 13:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-28 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9df5fa10901242201h75f40e40ic27dfb089dd90fc8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®