mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	markus.t.metzger@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] tracing: Fix section mismatch in trace_hw_branches.c
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:33:08 +0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9df5fa10902220533rb625291k135b3218151e12e5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090221152251.GA6807@nowhere>

On 2/21/09, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>  When I saw this patch, I searched the real purpose of __cpuinit and its
>  real impact.
>  But I didn't find any comments about it inside the kernel.
>
>  But today, by looking at the discussion around latest git pull for x86
>  to mainline, I discover that __cpuinit becomes __init on UP.
>
>  So, unless I missed something, this patch seems to me very dangerous.
>  The init and reset callbacks of a tracer can be called at any time, not only
>  on initcalls time (__init functions are freed from memory after the middle stage
>  of the boot).
>  With this patch, on UP we will dereference freed memory while activating this tracer.
If the init and reset callbacks of a tracer can be called regardless
of cpu hotpluging then it is. If the tracer's init or reset doesn't
rely on cpuhotplug then it shouldn't use it.
There's a another way to fix the warning is by remove __cpuinitdata
from bts_hotcpu_notifier.

Thanks,

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-22 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-14  3:36 Rakib Mullick
2009-02-15 19:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-21 15:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 13:33   ` Rakib Mullick [this message]
2009-02-22 16:22     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-23 10:21       ` Markus Metzger
2009-02-22 16:15   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-22 16:23     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22 19:29     ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b9df5fa10902220533rb625291k135b3218151e12e5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus.t.metzger@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®