From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: soc-core: Create device_link to ensure correct suspend order
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 12:22:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9e3f7cd-2329-43b0-89ca-0243e4916c16@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c9156cb-6508-4fda-8e36-7edc4eb7d6f9@samsung.com>
On 17/6/26 15:10, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> On 11.06.2026 13:08, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>> In snd_soc_bind_card() create a device_link from card to all components
>> to ensure correct order of system_suspend. The card is the consumer and
>> the components are the supplier, so that the card will system_suspend
>> before any of the components.
>>
>> The PM core will normally system_suspend drivers in the opposite order
>> that they registered. This ensures children are suspended before their
>> parents, for example users of a bus driver should suspend before the bus
>> driver suspends.
>>
>> For ASoC, snd_soc_suspend() shuts down any active audio, which requires
>> that the components are still able to communicate with their hardware.
>> Previously there was nothing to ensure this ordering, because there is
>> (usually) no relationship between a machine driver and component drivers.
>> If the machine driver registered before the codec drivers, the codec
>> drivers would be suspended before the machine driver snd_soc_suspend()
>> runs, so that ASoC is attempting to stop audio on a driver that has
>> already suspended.
>>
>> Creating a device_link is safe if there is already a device_link between
>> those devices because of multiple components sharing the same dev.
>> device_link_add() kernel doc says:
>>
>> "if a device link between the given @consumer and @supplier pair
>> exists already when this function is called for them, the existing link
>> will be returned regardless of its current type and status ...
>> The caller of this function is then expected to treat
>> the link as though it has just been created, so (in particular) if
>> DL_FLAG_STATELESS was passed in @flags, the link needs to be released
>> explicitly when not needed any more"
>>
>> For the same reason it is safe if the codec driver or machine driver
>> later call device_link_add() to create a link between the same two
>> devices.
>>
>> (I have tested creating multiple links between the card->dev and a
>> component->dev and did not encounter any problems with suspend/resume or
>> module unloading.)
>>
>> The DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_* flags assume that they are being called from
>> the probe() function of that device. This isn't guaranteed in ASoC card
>> binding because of deferred binding. The exact behavior and consequences
>> of the DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_* are also unclear from the documentation.
>> So DL_FLAG_STATELESS is used for safety, and the links are removed
>> explicitly when the card unbinds or if the bind fails.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
>> ---
>
>
> This patch landed recently in linux-next as commit 0f54ce994b23 ("ASoC:
> soc-core: Create device_link to ensure correct suspend order"). In my
> tests I found that it breaks probing of VC4 DRM subsystem on Raspberry Pi
> 3 and 4 boards due to an issue with hdmi-audio-codec:
>
> # dmesg | grep vc4
> vc4-drm gpu: bound fe400000.hvs (ops vc4_hvs_ops [vc4])
> vc4_hdmi fef00700.hdmi: Failed to create device link to hdmi-audio-codec.1.auto
> vc4_hdmi fef00700.hdmi: error -EINVAL: Could not register sound card
> vc4-drm gpu: failed to bind fef00700.hdmi (ops vc4_hdmi_ops [vc4]): -22
> vc4-drm gpu: adev bind failed: -22
> vc4-drm gpu: probe with driver vc4-drm failed with error -22
>
Where in device_link_add() does it fail?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 11:08 Richard Fitzgerald
2026-06-11 19:38 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <CGME20260617141046eucas1p2e85629d57bfc17449b135b16f9230d57@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2026-06-17 14:10 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-06-18 11:22 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2026-06-18 12:58 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-06-18 13:12 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-06-18 13:12 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2026-06-18 13:22 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-06-19 13:33 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2026-06-19 15:51 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-19 15:54 ` Charles Keepax
2026-06-19 16:04 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2026-06-19 17:19 ` Mark Brown
2026-06-20 15:57 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2026-06-22 7:07 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-06-23 10:22 ` Richard Fitzgerald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9e3f7cd-2329-43b0-89ca-0243e4916c16@opensource.cirrus.com \
--to=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®