From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: x86/paravirt: Detect over-sized patching bugs in paravirt_patch_call()
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:30:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9f94dff-24d1-7ded-9baa-0df6ec2b6a8b@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cde4b650-7fe5-869e-9cd8-327150bd092e@suse.com>
On 25/04/2019 13:30, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 25/04/2019 12:57, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:50:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>>> It basically means that we silently won't do any patching and the kernel
>>>>>> will crash later on in mysterious ways, because paravirt patching is
>>>>>> usually relied on.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's OK. The compiler emits an indirect CALL/JMP to the pv_ops
>>>>> structure contents. That _should_ stay valid and function correctly at
>>>>> all times.
>>>>
>>>> It might result in a correctly executing kernel in terms of code
>>>> generation, but it doesn't result in a viable kernel: some of the places
>>>> rely on the patching going through and don't know what to do when it
>>>> doesn't and misbehave or crash in interesting ways.
>>>>
>>>> Guess how I know this. ;-)
>>>
>>> What sites would that be? It really should work AFAIK.
>>
>> So for example I tried to increasing the size of one of the struct
>> patch_xxl members:
>>
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch.c
>> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct patch_xxl {
>> const unsigned char irq_restore_fl[2];
>> # ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> const unsigned char cpu_wbinvd[2];
>> - const unsigned char cpu_usergs_sysret64[6];
>> + const unsigned char cpu_usergs_sysret64[60];
>> const unsigned char cpu_swapgs[3];
>> const unsigned char mov64[3];
>> # else
>>
>> Which with the vanilla kernel crashes on boot much, much later:
>>
>> [ 2.478026] PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0
>
> Sure, there is no NOP padding applied. Pre-populating the area with
> 1 byte NOPs would avoid the crash.
This is wrong, of course.
But the indirect jmp is failing as struct pv_ops isn't mapped by the
user page tables.
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-25 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-24 13:41 [patch 0/3] x86/paravirt: Rework paravirt patching Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-24 13:41 ` [patch 1/3] x86/paravirt: Remove bogus extern declarations Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-25 7:31 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-24 7:58 ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-24 13:41 ` [patch 2/3] x86/paravirt: Unify 32/64 bit patch code Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-25 7:32 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-05-24 8:00 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] x86/paravirt: Unify the 32/64 bit paravirt patching code tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-24 13:41 ` [patch 3/3] x86/paravirt: Replace paravirt patch asm magic Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-25 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 7:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-25 7:46 ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-25 8:10 ` [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Match paravirt patchlet field definition ordering to initialization ordering Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 9:17 ` [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Detect oversized patching bugs as they happen and BUG_ON() to avoid later crashes Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 9:50 ` x86/paravirt: Detect over-sized patching bugs in paravirt_patch_call() Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 11:30 ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-25 12:30 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2019-04-25 11:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-24 7:59 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2019-05-24 7:58 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] x86/paravirt: Detect over-sized patching bugs in paravirt_patch_insns() tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2019-05-24 8:01 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] x86/paravirt: Match paravirt patchlet field definition ordering to initialization ordering tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2019-04-25 8:08 ` [patch 3/3] x86/paravirt: Replace paravirt patch asm magic Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-25 9:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-05-24 8:00 ` [tip:x86/paravirt] x86/paravirt: Replace the " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9f94dff-24d1-7ded-9baa-0df6ec2b6a8b@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome