From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6745FC00449 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F00A20835 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 13:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="bNXzP5XD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2F00A20835 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727009AbeJCTxi (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 15:53:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:34622 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726755AbeJCTxh (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2018 15:53:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id z4-v6so6061007wrb.1 for ; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 06:05:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yzWhglJwDwDoF4dy32MfWIQEKiw1LR/riwsf0+Snlv4=; b=bNXzP5XDuBFiafdtYXdCzePTVNkxY7LWU8bZFXOzzW8shMqtqO5YVid7E7MKyzbhIX d9bBxN3ponzQENK6v/RQHj3c3tCUGdxN2x8dj81msBKeDhVRQHQ+TXDtBs7ow96xCW+n cxlG0AEEMtPGTjDv3YrlqPowp1pUJ1H590eF4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yzWhglJwDwDoF4dy32MfWIQEKiw1LR/riwsf0+Snlv4=; b=EEXlkfukXJKpATvLe8qR5lOsun+dDDe1vbQc7heL42u9HJfz7LBS/1JOKgLhQwE2jp ovHQTwokHW9rIdoGT/mdxk++bHynlSKO1evuQvJQ8t9sYkSgS9tDE+jz9bf2Sibnr3E3 X1lsao0FetyhizEWvr/UL8aC9ncBH9USv8//Sx6QV5NzErAALDfodgouKkuZgvk6yBOZ g0oddGcC2opLx15qipbYCXLlDcia3vu9zA1aZyZRhC415sxPAsWJNOJBRJsG03lImN0+ 5tyt2tUCANPkSD8qDDFUOBU/HKbZMce23w7FGW3WSA6ecSHCRMfZQhObeH4eC0pQJkF9 MsVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfojSKQ1Pmm5ZFAA5PpZnGYriBJJsgr++JRp3eUg1t8dQSXp7HVSu dGx5nUOuFDfeJG2BuGvkLDfrbQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60TY4IGpL3S6VKDUlqetRnXqMybpr2+UTz+uydNm6m+Ubk9uKWGHQDYCInlourYA3TXU0WGyg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e48e:: with SMTP id i14-v6mr1252303wrm.145.1538571917084; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 06:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.41] (84.152.136.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.136.152.84]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v16-v6sm2094070wrw.12.2018.10.03.06.05.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Oct 2018 06:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] cpuidle/drivers/menu: Remove get_loadavg in the performance multiplier To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux PM , Todd Kjos , Joel Fernandes , Colin Cross , Ramesh Thomas , Alex Shi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mel Gorman References: <1537868328-13405-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <4200780.ZjVhNjpZ67@aspire.rjw.lan> From: Daniel Lezcano Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 15:05:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/10/2018 13:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:25 PM Daniel Lezcano [ ... ] > If you send a non-RFC patch to drop get_loadavg() (but you can drop it > altogether then, there are no other callers of it AFAICS), I'll queue > it up after the 4.20 (or whatever it turns out to be in the end) merge > window so all of the CIs out there have a chance to report issues (if > any). Sure, I can do that. There were some changes in this file, shall I base the patch on v4.19-rc6 or linux-pm/linux-next ? -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog