From: Xuanqiang Luo <xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: richardcochran@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
arnd@arndb.de, john.stultz@linaro.org, jacob.e.keller@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] ptp: fix NULL deref when adjtime/adjfine are missing
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:43:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba8e71ce-42e2-4c92-b7c8-dd6ce900a5d4@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9c97286-d121-40ca-b6f1-4c63641e7283@linux.dev>
Hi Vadim
在 2026/8/26 20:24, Vadim Fedorenko 写道:
> On 26/08/2026 11:10, Xuanqiang Luo wrote:
>> From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> ptp_clock_adjtime() invokes ->adjtime and ->adjfine unconditionally,
>> but both callbacks are optional.
>
> Could you please link to the source of this statement?
>
Ah, I noticed that ops->adjphase is checked for NULL, while
ops->adjtime and ops->adjfine are not. I then found that the iavf
driver does not register either callback, making the NULL-dereference
paths reachable. This led me to believe that these callbacks were
optional.
However, the PTP hardware clock documentation explicitly states:
Clock drivers must implement all of the functions in the interface. If
a clock does not offer a particular ancillary feature, then the driver
should just return -EOPNOTSUPP from those functions.
Link: https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/ptp.html#writing-clock-drivers
Therefore, iavf does not comply with this requirement, and fixing the
issue in the iavf driver is more appropriate.
Thank you for pointing this out, Vadim.
> clock_adjtime() with ADJ_SETOFFSET
>> or ADJ_FREQUENCY therefore oopses on a PHC that implements neither.
>>
>> iavf registers such a read-only clock: no adjtime/adjfine, and
>> max_adj left at 0. ADJ_SETOFFSET hits the NULL ->adjtime after the
>> offset is validated. ADJ_FREQUENCY with freq 0 converts to 0 ppb,
>> passes the max_adj check, and hits the NULL ->adjfine.
>>
>> Return -EOPNOTSUPP when the requested callback is missing, as the
>> adjphase path already does, rather than adding driver stubs.
>
> If PHC does not implement adjtime/adjfine/adjphase then it is a free-
> running clock. ptp_clock_adjtime() has the check for such clocks.
> To properly fix core part we have to extend ptp_clock and/or
> ptp_clock_info to properly signal that registered clock is
> free-running/read-only.
I understand your suggestion. However, I plan to fix the iavf driver
by providing the missing callbacks and returning -EOPNOTSUPP, as
required by the PTP documentation.
An explicit free-running/read-only state would only cover PHCs with no
adjustment callbacks at all. It would not cover PHCs that implement only
a subset of the adjustment callbacks. Marking those clocks as
free-running would also incorrectly reject operations that they do
support.
Therefore, I think a driver-side fix is more appropriate for this case.
I will revise the patch to fix iavf accordingly.
Thank you very much for your comments!
BRs,
Xuanqiang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 10:10 Xuanqiang Luo
2026-08-26 12:24 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2026-08-27 6:43 ` Xuanqiang Luo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba8e71ce-42e2-4c92-b7c8-dd6ce900a5d4@linux.dev \
--to=xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoxuanqiang@kylinos.cn \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®