From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Fully re-evaluate MMIO caching when SPTE masks change
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 19:37:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bab3cc28-4473-d446-bb6d-bca6939adb63@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALzav=e_H0LU+2-KcG_bPahVhJM8YGnH24J6aJ9HG9Eqj-waew@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/19/22 18:21, David Matlack wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 3:50 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fully re-evaluate whether or not MMIO caching can be enabled when SPTE
>> masks change; simply clearing enable_mmio_caching when a configuration
>> isn't compatible with caching fails to handle the scenario where the
>> masks are updated, e.g. by VMX for EPT or by SVM to account for the C-bit
>> location, and toggle compatibility from false=>true.
>>
>> Snapshot the original module param so that re-evaluating MMIO caching
>> preserves userspace's desire to allow caching. Use a snapshot approach
>> so that enable_mmio_caching still reflects KVM's actual behavior.
>
> Is updating module parameters to reflect the actual behavior (vs.
> userspace desire) something we should do for all module parameters?
>
> I am doing an unrelated refactor to the tdp_mmu module parameter and
> noticed it is not updated e.g. if userspace loads kvm_intel with
> ept=N.
If it is cheap/easy then yeah, updating the parameters is the right
thing to do. Generally, however, this is only done for
kvm_intel/kvm_amd modules that depend on hardware features, because they
are more important for debugging user issues. (Or at least they were
until vmx features were added to /proc/cpuinfo).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 22:49 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86/mmu: MMIO caching bug fixes Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Tag kvm_mmu_x86_module_init() with __init Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: x86/mmu: Fully re-evaluate MMIO caching when SPTE masks change Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:59 ` Kai Huang
2022-08-04 0:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-19 16:21 ` David Matlack
2022-08-19 17:37 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-08-24 21:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-03 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: SVM: Disable SEV-ES support if MMIO caching is disable Sean Christopherson
2022-08-05 11:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86/mmu: MMIO caching bug fixes Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bab3cc28-4473-d446-bb6d-bca6939adb63@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome