From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Heesoon Kim <Heesoon.Kim@stratus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding/802.3ad: fix slave link initialization transition states
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 22:40:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <babab0b4-7d12-15f1-e4ae-70a2ed832d78@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30882.1558732616@famine>
On 5/24/19 5:16 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Once in a while, with just the right timing, 802.3ad slaves will fail to
>> properly initialize, winding up in a weird state, with a partner system
>> mac address of 00:00:00:00:00:00. This started happening after a fix to
>> properly track link_failure_count tracking, where an 802.3ad slave that
>> reported itself as link up in the miimon code, but wasn't able to get a
>> valid speed/duplex, started getting set to BOND_LINK_FAIL instead of
>> BOND_LINK_DOWN. That was the proper thing to do for the general "my link
>> went down" case, but has created a link initialization race that can put
>> the interface in this odd state.
>
> Reading back in the git history, the ultimate cause of this
> "weird state" appears to be devices that assert NETDEV_UP prior to
> actually being able to supply sane speed/duplex values, correct?
>
> Presuming that this is the case, I don't see that there's much
> else to be done here, and so:
>
> Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Correct, we've got an miimon "device is up", but still can't get speed
and/or duplex in this case.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-25 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 13:49 Jarod Wilson
2019-05-24 21:16 ` Jay Vosburgh
2019-05-24 22:38 ` Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
2019-05-25 3:21 ` Jarod Wilson
2019-05-25 2:40 ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2019-05-26 20:29 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=babab0b4-7d12-15f1-e4ae-70a2ed832d78@redhat.com \
--to=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=Heesoon.Kim@stratus.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®