From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
To: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] module: Fix memory deallocation on error path in move_module()
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:17:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bae6e1f3-efbc-47d9-8eb4-653f851311d7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c277bfe-3086-4007-bf04-ef229e6cbfb7@suse.com>
>> One thing though, we are "releasing" the memory even if we have skipped the
>> allocation in the first place. So, I think it would make sense to release only
>> for the types we have actually allocated. What do you think?
>
> I noticed this too, specifically because move_module() is inconsistent
> in this regard with free_mod_mem(). The latter function contains:
>
> if (mod_mem->size)
> module_memory_free(mod, type);
>
> However, my preference is actually to update free_mod_mem() and remove
> the check. The function module_memory_free() should be a no-op if
> mod->base is NULL, similarly to how calling free(NULL) is a no-op.
>
Sound good to me. Perhaps a different patch type for cleanup/refactor. The fix
here would be back-ported to stable branches. So these are 2 different things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-07 16:16 [PATCH 0/2] " Petr Pavlu
2025-06-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Petr Pavlu
2025-06-08 7:25 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-06-09 22:12 ` Sami Tolvanen
2025-06-10 18:51 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 10:48 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-06-14 21:28 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 13:58 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-06-17 9:47 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-17 15:41 ` Petr Pavlu
2025-06-17 17:17 ` Daniel Gomez [this message]
2025-06-07 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] module: Avoid unnecessary return value initialization " Petr Pavlu
2025-06-09 22:13 ` Sami Tolvanen
2025-06-10 18:56 ` Daniel Gomez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bae6e1f3-efbc-47d9-8eb4-653f851311d7@kernel.org \
--to=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®