From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, heming.zhao@suse.com,
ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, baijiaju1990@gmail.com,
jjzuming@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: serialize inode journal access with shutdown
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 19:05:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb060249-5d18-493f-837d-879ba3937ef8@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pm-ocfs2-objects-candidate-0004-v8-dbcb8f80b8df476084d6@gmail.com>
On 10/30/26 12:48 PM, Cen Zhang wrote:
> The downconvert thread can run inode cleanup until ocfs2_dlm_shutdown()
> stops it, but unmount shuts down the journal earlier. A final dentry
> post-unlock put can therefore enter ocfs2_clear_inode() while the journal
> is being destroyed.
>
> ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed() loads osb->journal before taking
> trans_inc_lock. Journal shutdown neither takes that lock for removal
> nor waits for the downconvert thread before freeing the journal:
>
> Downconvert thread Unmount
> ------------------ -------
> dentry post-unlock; final iput()
> ocfs2_checkpoint_inode()
> load osb->journal
> ocfs2_journal_shutdown()
> free journal; clear pointer
> read the transaction ID
>
> The checkpoint wait queue is embedded in that journal, and the final
> jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode() also needs its JBD2 journal to remain
> alive for the whole call. Protecting only the pointer load would leave
> those longer uses unprotected.
>
> Read and clear osb->journal under trans_inc_lock when checking checkpoint
> progress. Treat a removed journal as checkpointed. Move checkpoint
> waiters to the existing mount-owned checkpoint_event and wake it after
> checkpoint progress and journal removal, so the queue outlives the
> journal. The commit thread also waits there and rechecks its condition
> when woken.
>
> Serialize the final JBD2 inode release against JBD2 destruction and the
> journal free with a mount-owned rw_semaphore. Take the write side only
> after stopping the commit thread, and drop it before the journal inode's
> final iput(), whose cleanup can take the read side. Inode cleanup holds
> the read side only around the JBD2 release, outside checkpoint waits and
> DLM lock teardown.
>
> KASAN report as below:
>
> Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000e: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI
> KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000070-0x0000000000000077]
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 587 Comm: ocfs2dc-33CAF04 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc4-next-20260921-pmb-ocfs2-functional-v1+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
> Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:ocfs2_clear_inode+0x8ae/0x1630
> Code: fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 27 0c 00 00 49 8d 7d 70 48 8b 43 c8 48 ba 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 f9 48 c1 e9 03 <80> 3c 11 00 0f 85 f0 0b 00 00 49 3b 45 70 0f 88 62 03 00 00 e8 49
> RSP: 0018:ffff888118d3f878 EFLAGS: 00010212
> RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88811a5edc60 RCX: 000000000000000e
> RDX: dffffc0000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000070
> RBP: ffff888116134000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: ffffffff8965765f R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88811a5ed400
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88811a5edbf8 R15: ffff88811a5ed408
> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881fd4dc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00007ff35b66f2c0 CR3: 00000001092ae005 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
> PKRU: 55555554
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_clear_inode+0x10/0x10
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_inode_is_valid_to_delete+0x10/0x10
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __lock_acquire+0x5a3/0x2140
> ocfs2_evict_inode+0x1ed/0x11e0
> ? inode_wait_for_writeback+0x14c/0x330
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_evict_inode+0x10/0x10
> ? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
> ? evict+0x347/0x9f0
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
> ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x23/0x40
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_evict_inode+0x10/0x10
> evict+0x38b/0x9f0
> ? __pfx_evict+0x10/0x10
> ? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
> ? __pfx_inode_just_drop+0x10/0x10
> iput+0x680/0xb80
> ocfs2_dentry_lock_put+0xc2/0x110
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_dentry_post_unlock+0x10/0x10
> ocfs2_process_blocked_lock+0x1fb/0x420
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_process_blocked_lock+0x10/0x10
> ? __pfx_pmbd_probe_hit_cookie+0x10/0x10
> ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xeb/0x1a0
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ocfs2_downconvert_thread+0x32b/0x780
> ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x130/0x270
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_downconvert_thread+0x10/0x10
> ? __kthread_parkme+0xc1/0x220
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
> ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __kthread_parkme+0x177/0x220
> ? __pfx_ocfs2_downconvert_thread+0x10/0x10
> kthread+0x351/0x460
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
> ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __switch_to+0x74f/0xf70
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
> Modules linked in:
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>
> Fixes: da5e7c87827e ("ocfs2: cleanup journal init and shutdown")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems the merge is safe because both sides use condition-based waits.
Before the patch there were two half-duplex queues forming a cycle:
ocfs2_checkpoint_inode()-->start_checkpoint-->checkpoint_event-->commit thread
^ |
|---------------- j_checkpointed <-- commit_cache() -------------|
j_checkpointed had exactly one waiter (ocfs2_checkpoint_inode) and one waker
(ocfs2_commit_cache). checkpoint_event had one waiter (ocfs2_commit_thread)
and one waker (ocfs2_start_checkpoint). Scope is identical too — one journal
per osb.
So it looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> fs/ocfs2/journal.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/ocfs2/journal.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 1 +
> fs/ocfs2/super.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index 80c36c60a8ce..e225a96d3753 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1318,15 +1318,16 @@ static void ocfs2_clear_inode(struct inode *inode)
> oi->ip_blkno = 0ULL;
>
> /*
> - * ip_jinode is used to track txns against this inode. We ensure that
> - * the journal is flushed before journal shutdown. Thus it is safe to
> - * have inodes get cleaned up after journal shutdown.
> + * ip_jinode is used to track txns against this inode. The journal is
> + * flushed before it is shut down, so an inode cleaned up after that
> + * has nothing left to release. Hold the shutdown lock so a journal
> + * found here stays allocated until the release has finished.
> */
> - if (!osb->journal)
> - return;
> -
> - jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode(osb->journal->j_journal,
> - &oi->ip_jinode);
> + down_read(&osb->journal_shutdown_sem);
> + if (osb->journal)
> + jbd2_journal_release_jbd_inode(osb->journal->j_journal,
> + &oi->ip_jinode);
> + up_read(&osb->journal_shutdown_sem);
> }
>
> void ocfs2_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/journal.c b/fs/ocfs2/journal.c
> index cc60db6b9706..8486c5edc5da 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/journal.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static int ocfs2_commit_cache(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
> trace_ocfs2_commit_cache_end(journal->j_trans_id, flushed);
>
> ocfs2_wake_downconvert_thread(osb);
> - wake_up(&journal->j_checkpointed);
> + wake_up(&osb->checkpoint_event);
> finally:
> return status;
> }
> @@ -892,7 +892,6 @@ int ocfs2_journal_alloc(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
>
> atomic_set(&journal->j_num_trans, 0);
> init_rwsem(&journal->j_trans_barrier);
> - init_waitqueue_head(&journal->j_checkpointed);
> spin_lock_init(&journal->j_lock);
> journal->j_trans_id = 1UL;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journal->j_la_cleanups);
> @@ -1064,12 +1063,14 @@ void ocfs2_journal_shutdown(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
>
> journal = osb->journal;
> if (!journal)
> - goto done;
> + return;
>
> inode = journal->j_inode;
>
> - if (journal->j_state != OCFS2_JOURNAL_LOADED)
> - goto done;
> + if (journal->j_state != OCFS2_JOURNAL_LOADED) {
> + down_write(&osb->journal_shutdown_sem);
> + goto free;
> + }
>
> /* need to inc inode use count - jbd2_journal_destroy will iput. */
> if (!igrab(inode))
> @@ -1105,6 +1106,12 @@ void ocfs2_journal_shutdown(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
> mlog_errno(status);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Exclude the final JBD2 inode cleanup in ocfs2_clear_inode() while
> + * the journal is destroyed and freed.
> + */
> + down_write(&osb->journal_shutdown_sem);
> +
> /* Shutdown the kernel journal system */
> if (!jbd2_journal_destroy(journal->j_journal) && !status) {
> /*
> @@ -1127,10 +1134,17 @@ void ocfs2_journal_shutdown(struct ocfs2_super *osb)
>
> journal->j_state = OCFS2_JOURNAL_FREE;
>
> -done:
> - iput(inode);
> - kfree(journal);
> +free:
> + /* Serialize the removal with ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed(). */
> + spin_lock(&trans_inc_lock);
> osb->journal = NULL;
> + spin_unlock(&trans_inc_lock);
> + wake_up(&osb->checkpoint_event);
> + kfree(journal);
> + up_write(&osb->journal_shutdown_sem);
> +
> + /* The journal inode's own cleanup takes the read side. */
> + iput(inode);
> }
>
> static void ocfs2_clear_journal_error(struct super_block *sb,
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/journal.h b/fs/ocfs2/journal.h
> index 19fc920d26b1..fe024ec5adcc 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/journal.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/journal.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct ocfs2_journal {
> spinlock_t j_lock;
> unsigned long j_trans_id;
> struct rw_semaphore j_trans_barrier;
> - wait_queue_head_t j_checkpointed;
>
> /* both fields protected by j_lock*/
> struct list_head j_la_cleanups;
> @@ -91,11 +90,15 @@ static inline void ocfs2_set_ci_lock_trans(struct ocfs2_journal *journal,
> static inline int ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci)
> {
> int ret;
> - struct ocfs2_journal *journal =
> - OCFS2_SB(ocfs2_metadata_cache_get_super(ci))->journal;
> + struct ocfs2_super *osb =
> + OCFS2_SB(ocfs2_metadata_cache_get_super(ci));
> + struct ocfs2_journal *journal;
>
> spin_lock(&trans_inc_lock);
> - ret = time_after(journal->j_trans_id, ci->ci_last_trans);
> + journal = osb->journal;
> + /* A NULL journal has already completed checkpointing. */
> + ret = !journal ||
> + time_after(journal->j_trans_id, ci->ci_last_trans);
> spin_unlock(&trans_inc_lock);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -195,9 +198,6 @@ static inline void ocfs2_checkpoint_inode(struct inode *inode)
> if (ocfs2_mount_local(osb))
> return;
>
> - if (!osb->journal)
> - return;
> -
> if (!ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed(INODE_CACHE(inode))) {
> /* WARNING: This only kicks off a single
> * checkpoint. If someone races you and adds more
> @@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ static inline void ocfs2_checkpoint_inode(struct inode *inode)
> * OK. */
> ocfs2_start_checkpoint(osb);
>
> - wait_event(osb->journal->j_checkpointed,
> + /* The wait queue must outlive journal shutdown. */
> + wait_event(osb->checkpoint_event,
> ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed(INODE_CACHE(inode)));
> }
> }
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> index e3bb3cc0b25a..8bee145e4888 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
> @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ struct ocfs2_super
> enum ocfs2_recovery_state recovery_state;
> wait_queue_head_t checkpoint_event;
> struct ocfs2_journal *journal;
> + struct rw_semaphore journal_shutdown_sem;
> unsigned long osb_commit_interval;
>
> /* Journal triggers for checksum */
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
> index 0af2245ae303..3ffe1143ea50 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
> @@ -2045,6 +2045,7 @@ static int ocfs2_initialize_super(struct super_block *sb,
> }
>
> init_waitqueue_head(&osb->checkpoint_event);
> + init_rwsem(&osb->journal_shutdown_sem);
>
> osb->s_atime_quantum = OCFS2_DEFAULT_ATIME_QUANTUM;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 4:48 Cen Zhang
2026-11-04 11:05 ` Joseph Qi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb060249-5d18-493f-837d-879ba3937ef8@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jjzuming@gmail.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®