From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: add KVM_CREATE_VM2 to allow dynamic kvm->vcpus array
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:11:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb0cda85-6222-5cb7-718f-bbc70cd6297c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413201951.11939-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com>
On 13.04.2017 22:19, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The basic idea is to let userspace provide the desired maximal number of
> VCPUs and allocate only necessary memory for them.
>
> The goal is to freeze KVM_MAX_VCPUS at its current level and only increase the
KVM_MAX_VCPUS might still increase e.g. if hw support for more VCPUs is
comming.
> new KVM_MAX_CONFIGURABLE_VCPUS, probably directly to INT_MAX/KVM_VCPU_ID, so we
> don't have to worry about it for a while.
>
> PPC should be interested in this as they set KVM_MAX_VCPUS to NR_CPUS
> and probably waste few pages for every guest this way.
As we just store pointers, this should be a maximum of 4 pages for ppc
(4k pages). Is this really worth yet another VM creation ioctl? Is there
not a nicer way to handle this internally?
An alternative might be to simply realloc the array when it reaches a
certain size (on VCPU creation, maybe protecting the pointer via rcu).
But not sure if something like that could work.
>
>
> Radim Krčmář (4):
> KVM: remove unused __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC
> KVM: allocate kvm->vcpus separately
> KVM: add KVM_CREATE_VM2 system ioctl
> KVM: x86: enable configurable MAX_VCPU
>
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c | 4 +--
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 23 +++++-------
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 8 +++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 6 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
--
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-13 20:19 Radim Krčmář
2017-04-13 20:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: remove unused __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC Radim Krčmář
2017-04-18 10:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-04-13 20:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: allocate kvm->vcpus separately Radim Krčmář
2017-04-13 20:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: add KVM_CREATE_VM2 system ioctl Radim Krčmář
2017-04-18 14:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-18 14:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-04-24 16:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-24 20:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-13 20:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: enable configurable MAX_VCPU Radim Krčmář
2017-04-19 8:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-04-24 17:00 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-18 11:11 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2017-04-18 12:29 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: add KVM_CREATE_VM2 to allow dynamic kvm->vcpus array Cornelia Huck
2017-04-24 20:03 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-04-24 17:03 ` Radim Krčmář
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bb0cda85-6222-5cb7-718f-bbc70cd6297c@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome