mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib/stackdepot: Double DEPOT_POOLS_CAP if KASAN is enabled
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 22:37:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb6ac53d-26e6-4e40-82c6-5b979b5dda1c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240808023215.1160684-1-longman@redhat.com>


On 8/7/24 22:32, Waiman Long wrote:
> As said in commit 02754e0a484a ("lib/stackdepot.c: bump stackdepot
> capacity from 16MB to 128MB"), KASAN uses stackdepot to memorize stacks
> for all kmalloc/kfree calls. So stackdepot capacity was increased 8
> times to accommodate KASAN usage even thought it was claimed 4X should
> be enough at that time.
>
> With commit fc60e0caa94d ("lib/stackdepot: use fixed-sized slots
> for stack records"), all stackdepot records uses a fixed size with
> CONFIG_STACKDEPOT_MAX_FRAMES (default=64) entries. This is merged to
> support evictable KASAN stack records. Commit 31639fd6cebd ("stackdepot:
> use variable size records for non-evictable entries") re-enabled
> the use of variable size records for non-KASAN use cases, but KASAN
> (generic mode) still uses the large fixed size stack records.
>
> With the default CONFIG_STACKDEPOT_MAX_FRAMES of 64, KASAN use of
> stackdepot space had been more than double than before. Assuming an
> average stack frame size of 16, a KASAN stack record is almost 4X the
> size of a non-KASAN one.
>
> When a wide variety of workloads are run on a debug kernel with KASAN
> enabled, the following warning may sometimes be printed.
>
>   [ 6818.650674] Stack depot reached limit capacity
>   [ 6818.650730] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 272741 at lib/stackdepot.c:252 depot_alloc_stack+0x39e/0x3d0
>     :
>   [ 6818.650907] Call Trace:
>   [ 6818.650909]  [<00047dd453d84b92>] depot_alloc_stack+0x3a2/0x3d0
>   [ 6818.650916]  [<00047dd453d85254>] stack_depot_save_flags+0x4f4/0x5c0
>   [ 6818.650920]  [<00047dd4535872c6>] kasan_save_stack+0x56/0x70
>   [ 6818.650924]  [<00047dd453587328>] kasan_save_track+0x28/0x40
>   [ 6818.650927]  [<00047dd45358a27a>] kasan_save_free_info+0x4a/0x70
>   [ 6818.650930]  [<00047dd45358766a>] __kasan_slab_free+0x12a/0x1d0
>   [ 6818.650933]  [<00047dd45350deb4>] kmem_cache_free+0x1b4/0x580
>   [ 6818.650938]  [<00047dd452c520da>] __put_task_struct+0x24a/0x320
>   [ 6818.650945]  [<00047dd452c6aee4>] delayed_put_task_struct+0x294/0x350
>   [ 6818.650949]  [<00047dd452e9066a>] rcu_do_batch+0x6ea/0x2090
>   [ 6818.650953]  [<00047dd452ea60f4>] rcu_core+0x474/0xa90
>   [ 6818.650956]  [<00047dd452c780c0>] handle_softirqs+0x3c0/0xf90
>   [ 6818.650960]  [<00047dd452c76fbe>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x35e/0x460
>   [ 6818.650963]  [<00047dd452c79992>] irq_exit_rcu+0x22/0xb0
>   [ 6818.650966]  [<00047dd454bd8128>] do_ext_irq+0xd8/0x120
>   [ 6818.650972]  [<00047dd454c0ddd0>] ext_int_handler+0xb8/0xe8
>   [ 6818.650979]  [<00047dd453589cf6>] kasan_check_range+0x236/0x2f0
>   [ 6818.650982]  [<00047dd453378cf0>] filemap_get_pages+0x190/0xaa0
>   [ 6818.650986]  [<00047dd453379940>] filemap_read+0x340/0xa70
>   [ 6818.650989]  [<00047dd3d325d226>] xfs_file_buffered_read+0x2c6/0x400 [xfs]
>   [ 6818.651431]  [<00047dd3d325dfe2>] xfs_file_read_iter+0x2c2/0x550 [xfs]
>   [ 6818.651663]  [<00047dd45364710c>] vfs_read+0x64c/0x8c0
>   [ 6818.651669]  [<00047dd453648ed8>] ksys_read+0x118/0x200
>   [ 6818.651672]  [<00047dd452b6cf5a>] do_syscall+0x27a/0x380
>   [ 6818.651676]  [<00047dd454bd7e74>] __do_syscall+0xf4/0x1a0
>   [ 6818.651680]  [<00047dd454c0db58>] system_call+0x70/0x98
>
> With all the recent changes in stackdepot to support new KASAN features,
> it is obvious that the current DEPOT_POOLS_CAP of 8192 may not be
> enough when KASAN is enabled. Fix this stackdepot capability issue
> by doubling DEPOT_POOLS_CAP if KASAN is enabled. With 4k pages, the
> maximum stackdepot capacity is doubled to 256 MB with KASAN enabled.
>
> Also use the MIN() macro for defining DEPOT_MAX_POOLS to clarify the
> intention.
>
> Fixes: fc60e0caa94d ("lib/stackdepot: use fixed-sized slots for stack records")
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
>   lib/stackdepot.c | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
> index 5ed34cc963fc..beeb70b57710 100644
> --- a/lib/stackdepot.c
> +++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
> @@ -36,11 +36,12 @@
>   #include <linux/memblock.h>
>   #include <linux/kasan-enabled.h>
>   
> -#define DEPOT_POOLS_CAP 8192
> +/* KASAN is a big user of stackdepot, double the cap if KASAN is enabled */
> +#define DEPOT_POOLS_CAP (8192 * (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN) ? 2 : 1))
> +
>   /* The pool_index is offset by 1 so the first record does not have a 0 handle. */
>   #define DEPOT_MAX_POOLS \
> -	(((1LL << (DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS)) - 1 < DEPOT_POOLS_CAP) ? \
> -	 (1LL << (DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS)) - 1 : DEPOT_POOLS_CAP)
> +	MIN((1LL << (DEPOT_POOL_INDEX_BITS)) - 1, DEPOT_POOLS_CAP)
>   
>   static bool stack_depot_disabled;
>   static bool __stack_depot_early_init_requested __initdata = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKDEPOT_ALWAYS_INIT);

Sorry, I accidentally send it twice. Please ignore this version.

BTW, the code change is the same as v1, but the description is updated 
to reflect my investigation as why we need to double DEPOT_POOLS_CAP for 
KASAN.

Cheers,
Longman


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-08  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-08  2:32 Waiman Long
2024-08-08  2:37 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2024-08-08  9:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-08  2:24 Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb6ac53d-26e6-4e40-82c6-5b979b5dda1c@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®