RE: [PATCH net-next v2] rtase: Use min() instead of min_t()

[Justin Lai <justinlai0215@realtek.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@realtek.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 2:34 PM
> To: kuba@kernel.org
> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; pabeni@redhat.com;
> andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; horms@kernel.org; Ping-Ke Shih
> <pkshih@realtek.com>; Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@realtek.com>; Justin Lai
> <justinlai0215@realtek.com>; Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] rtase: Use min() instead of min_t()
> 
> Use min() instead of min_t() to avoid the possibility of casting to the
> wrong type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@realtek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - Remove the Fixes tag.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> index 6251548d50ff..8c902eaeb5ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> @@ -1983,7 +1983,7 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_time_mitigation(u32 time_us)
>  	u8 msb, time_count, time_unit;
>  	u16 int_miti;
> 
> -	time_us = min_t(int, time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
> +	time_us = min(time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
> 
>  	msb = fls(time_us);
>  	if (msb >= RTASE_MITI_COUNT_BIT_NUM) {
> @@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_packet_num_mitigation(u16
> pkt_num)
>  	u8 msb, pkt_num_count, pkt_num_unit;
>  	u16 int_miti;
> 
> -	pkt_num = min_t(int, pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
> +	pkt_num = min(pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
> 
>  	if (pkt_num > 60) {
>  		pkt_num_unit = RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM_IDX;
> --
> 2.34.1

Hi reviewers,

I apologize for the interruption, I would like to ask why this patch is
rejected on patchwork.

Justin