From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>, <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Cap initial sdev queue depth at shost.can_queue
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:14:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bba5f248-523d-0def-1a3e-bafeb2b7633f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YH4aIECa/J/1uS5S@T590>
On 20/04/2021 01:02, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:06:24AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>> Function sdev_store_queue_depth() enforces that the sdev queue depth cannot
>> exceed shost.can_queue.
>>
>> However, the LLDD may still set cmd_per_lun > can_queue, which leads to an
>> initial sdev queue depth greater than can_queue.
>>
>> Stop this happened by capping initial sdev queue depth at can_queue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Topic originally discussed at:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/85dec8eb-8eab-c7d6-b0fb-5622747c5499@interlog.com/T/#m5663d0cac657d843b93d0c9a2374f98fc04384b9
>>
>> Last idea there was to error/warn in scsi_add_host() for cmd_per_lun >
>
Hi Ming,
> No, that isn't my suggestion.
Right, it was what I mentioned.
>
>> can_queue. However, such a shost driver could still configure the sdev
>> queue depth to be sound value at .slave_configure callback, so now thinking
>> the orig patch better.
>
> As I mentioned last time, why can't we fix ->cmd_per_lun in
> scsi_add_host() using .can_queue?
>
I would rather not change the values which are provided from the driver.
I would rather take the original values and try to use them in a sane way.
I have not seen other places where driver shost config values are
modified by the core code.
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-19 16:06 John Garry
2021-04-20 0:02 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-20 8:14 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-04-22 1:38 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-22 16:35 ` John Garry
2021-04-23 1:54 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bba5f248-523d-0def-1a3e-bafeb2b7633f@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®