From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nvmet-loop: Flush nvme_delete_wq when removing the port
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 15:20:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbbfdcda-5acc-a02c-565a-929180ab6c0c@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190703230304.22905-3-logang@deltatee.com>
On 7/4/2019 2:03 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> After calling nvme_loop_delete_ctrl(), the controllers will not
> yet be deleted because nvme_delete_ctrl() only schedules work
> to do the delete.
>
> This means a race can occur if a port is removed but there
> are still active controllers trying to access that memory.
>
> To fix this, flush the nvme_delete_wq before returning from
> nvme_loop_remove_port() so that any controllers that might
> be in the process of being deleted won't access a freed port.
>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/target/loop.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
> index 9e211ad6bdd3..da9cd07461fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
> @@ -654,6 +654,14 @@ static void nvme_loop_remove_port(struct nvmet_port *port)
> mutex_lock(&nvme_loop_ports_mutex);
> list_del_init(&port->entry);
> mutex_unlock(&nvme_loop_ports_mutex);
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure any ctrls that are in the process of being
> + * deleted are in fact deleted before we return
> + * and free the port. This is to prevent active
> + * ctrls from using a port after it's freed.
> + */
> + flush_workqueue(nvme_delete_wq);
> }
>
> static const struct nvmet_fabrics_ops nvme_loop_ops = {
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-05 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-03 23:03 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix use-after-free bug when ports are removed Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-03 23:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nvmet: Fix use-after-free bug when a port is removed Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-03 23:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-07-04 21:00 ` Max Gurtovoy
2019-07-04 21:01 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-05 12:17 ` Max Gurtovoy
2019-07-03 23:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvmet-loop: Flush nvme_delete_wq when removing the port Logan Gunthorpe
2019-07-03 23:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-07-05 12:20 ` Max Gurtovoy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbbfdcda-5acc-a02c-565a-929180ab6c0c@mellanox.com \
--to=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®