Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make vmalloc_dump_obj() call in a preemptible context

["Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>]

On 2022/11/16 22:15, Zqiang wrote:
> Currently, the mem_dump_obj() is invoked in call_rcu(), the

Plan to call mem_dump_obj() in rcu_do_batch().

> call_rcu() is maybe invoked in non-preemptive code segment,
> for object allocated from vmalloc(), the following scenarios
> may occur:
> 
> 	CPU 0
> tasks context
>    spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock)
>           Interrupt context
> 	      call_rcu()
> 		mem_dump_obj
>                   vmalloc_dump_obj
>                     spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock) <--deadlock
> 
> and for PREEMPT-RT kernel, the spinlock will convert to sleepable
> lock, it also make vmap_area_lock spinlock can not acquire in
> non-preemptive code segment. therefore, this commit make the
> vmalloc_dump_obj() call in a preemptible context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  mm/util.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 12984e76767e..465f8b8824ca 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -1124,8 +1124,12 @@ void mem_dump_obj(void *object)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (vmalloc_dump_obj(object))
> -		return;
> +	if (is_vmalloc_addr(object)) {
> +		if (preemptible() && vmalloc_dump_obj(object))

preemptible() --> !in_interrupt()?

> +			return;
> +		type = "vmalloc memory";
> +		goto end;
> +	}

Move into vmalloc_dump_obj()?

>  
>  	if (virt_addr_valid(object))
>  		type = "non-slab/vmalloc memory";
> @@ -1135,7 +1139,7 @@ void mem_dump_obj(void *object)
>  		type = "zero-size pointer";
>  	else
>  		type = "non-paged memory";
> -
> +end:
>  	pr_cont(" %s\n", type);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mem_dump_obj);
> 

-- 
Regards,
  Zhen Lei