Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Skip proxy votes on clocks for QCM2290

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 9/16/26 1:05 PM, Imran Shaik wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11-09-2026 02:36 pm, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 9/10/26 3:44 PM, Imran Shaik wrote:
>>> clk_smd_rpm_handoff() votes both active and sleep RPM resource states for
>>> every clock, keeping them non-zero until a consumer takes over. If there
>>> is no consumer, those clocks will remain active in the idle scenario as
>>> well, and the sleep vote is never cleared, blocking XO shutdown.
>>>
>>> Introduce the skip_clks_handoff flag to handle this on QCM2290 clocks,
>>> keeping other targets unaffected.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 00f64b58874e ("clk: qcom: Add support for SMD-RPM Clocks")
>>> Signed-off-by: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Are you booting with clk_ignore_unused?
>>
> 
> No Konrad, clk_ignore_unused is not present.
> 
> Irrespective of clk_ignore_unused, the proxy votes are placed to RPM
> during handoff. If no consumer takes over, those votes remain active,
> keeping the resource ON in idle and preventing XO shutdown.

I re-read this and yeah you're right

Is the handoff functionality necessary at all for non-icc clocks?
I'm suspecting that this was just a port of the ancient msm-3.10
logic where the (modified) clock framework had a handoff mechanism
similar to today's sync_state, except the toning-down of these
clocks was never added

Konrad