From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E634C433DF for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D960D206D5 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="L1Kvk0TY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729271AbgFHJrP (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 05:47:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:56455 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728745AbgFHJrP (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 05:47:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1591609634; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oRvR0z9DPHYwpMI8dWRlJVdbfk+Jsh/v5E8QlIJ9FT8=; b=L1Kvk0TY0RfO/qr0xq+5E+dkkWTcl1Sn5WA576ZztzJqoBruOhcTcM3+mc7PohCZcQVN9x TwZlazfRCGg4BSkDTq+v80yGDwjsI5R3Ixnn6mWwmp/K7+8iZeaB4K86+Xx4D4FMEGNjLD tGMVDDYilPI7YbkB3QQAjVSL0Ts7Guw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-250-2HOf27seOnqEVafcIC1r1A-1; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 05:47:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2HOf27seOnqEVafcIC1r1A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C3E68014D4; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.72.13.71] (ovpn-13-71.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.71]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E755D9C9; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] vdpa: introduce virtio pci driver To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob.miller@broadcom.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, shahafs@mellanox.com, hanand@xilinx.com, mhabets@solarflare.com, gdawar@xilinx.com, saugatm@xilinx.com, vmireyno@marvell.com, zhangweining@ruijie.com.cn, eli@mellanox.com References: <20200529080303.15449-6-jasowang@redhat.com> <20200602010332-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <5dbb0386-beeb-5bf4-d12e-fb5427486bb8@redhat.com> <6b1d1ef3-d65e-08c2-5b65-32969bb5ecbc@redhat.com> <20200607095012-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <9b1abd2b-232c-aa0f-d8bb-03e65fd47de2@redhat.com> <20200608021438-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200608052041-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <9d2571b6-0b95-53b3-6989-b4d801eeb623@redhat.com> <20200608054453-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Jason Wang Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 17:46:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200608054453-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/6/8 下午5:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 05:43:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> Looking at >>>> pci_match_one_device() it checks both subvendor and subdevice there. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> But IIUC there is no guarantee that driver with a specific subvendor >>> matches in presence of a generic one. >>> So either IFC or virtio pci can win, whichever binds first. >> >> I'm not sure I get there. But I try manually bind IFCVF to qemu's >> virtio-net-pci, and it fails. >> >> Thanks > Right but the reverse can happen: virtio-net can bind to IFCVF first. That's kind of expected. The PF is expected to be bound to virtio-pci to create VF via sysfs. Thanks >