From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EE5C04EB9 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B452921019 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 23:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="fnpn/390" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B452921019 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727198AbeK3K7M (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2018 05:59:12 -0500 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:57388 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726425AbeK3K7L (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Nov 2018 05:59:11 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wATNpimc101196; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:51:44 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1543535504; bh=tErd/PzWg968xjuFgC02pq+KxnMGvdMLs3JwC169iGs=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=fnpn/3908ztxbnCHzeeT6d05vWJLYgqtwec13i0DLVqLmBLJ1qU+oGHgSklp6ZDHB FFJosqAee1jQ+L0/rfvegV2K5tuG4a8smRZtRR6iFsK9bCqZFox1o/XapxmRmVb9y+ XcHl2ivrElJBBX4F9AQPqATP9w/D20bxb+lKsOew= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wATNpiGB083149 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:51:44 -0600 Received: from DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:51:43 -0600 Received: from dlep33.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.75) by DFLE107.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:51:43 -0600 Received: from [128.247.59.147] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wATNpheu018978; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:51:43 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: allow to configure min tx packet size To: David Miller , CC: , , , References: <20181128220211.GA5037@lunn.ch> <0b70091e-3747-ee8f-15d6-4532e210278e@ti.com> <20181129002835.GB5037@lunn.ch> <20181128.172212.1033397162837638079.davem@davemloft.net> From: Grygorii Strashko Message-ID: Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:51:43 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181128.172212.1033397162837638079.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, On 11/28/18 7:22 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Lunn > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:28:35 +0100 > >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:43:40PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, >>> >>> On 11/28/18 4:02 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>>>> This is dynamic configuration related to ALE VLAN entries and >>>>> I do not see the way to support its auto-detection with current driver, >>>>> unfortunately. >>>> >>>> I think you can subscribe to switchdev events which will tell you. >>> >>> Thanks a lot for your review and comments. >>> >>> Unfortunately, we still do not have switchdev in place, but i need to resolve >>> existing issue somehow. This patch is small, local to CPSW fix which can be >>> backported to stable. So, if possible, and no strong objection, could we proceed with it? >> >> Hi Grygorii >> >> David is the person who generally says no to kernel module >> parameters. You should ask him. > > No module options. > > You'll be stuck with it forever. Thank you for your feedback. -- regards, -grygorii