mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Gomes <julien@arista.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipmr: restrict mroute "queue full" warning to related error values
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:52:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc8a9605-2df7-821f-5103-e9acb4482f3a@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170623.133947.433422648753848462.davem@davemloft.net>

On 06/23/2017 10:39 AM, David Miller wrote:

> From: Julien Gomes <julien@arista.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:58:10 -0700
>
>> When sending a cache report on mroute_sk, mroute will emit a
>> "pending queue full" warning for every error value returned by
>> sock_queue_rcv_skb().
>> This warning can be misleading, for example on the EPERM error value
>> that sk_filter() can return.
>>
>> Restricting this warning to only ENOMEM or ENOBUFS seems more
>> appropriate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Gomes <julien@arista.com>
> Incorrect, no other error codes are possible.
>
> We never attach a socket filter to these kernel internal sockets,
> therefore sk_filter() is not even applicable in this analysis.
>
> Therefore, -ENOBUFS and -ENOMEM are the only errors we can ever see
> returned from sock_queue_rcv_skb().
>
> This goes for your second patch as well.

Up to now I would agree, but now that cache reports are also sent
through Netlink, wouldn't it make sense to allow the user of mroute_sk
to attach a filter to it in order to not receive cache reports on it?

I agree this is not crucial in any way, but this could be a way to let
the user program choose whether it receives the reports through one
of the mediums, and not inevitably both.

-- 
Julien Gomes

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-23 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-21 17:58 Julien Gomes
2017-06-21 17:58 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] ip6mr: restrict mroute6 " Julien Gomes
2017-06-23 17:39 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] ipmr: restrict mroute " David Miller
2017-06-23 17:52   ` Julien Gomes [this message]
2017-06-23 18:47     ` David Miller
2017-06-23 20:17       ` Julien Gomes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc8a9605-2df7-821f-5103-e9acb4482f3a@arista.com \
    --to=julien@arista.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®