From: hanjinke <hanjinke.666@bytedance.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: make dioread_nolock consistent in each mapping round
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:10:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc8f48ce-7280-c70a-db7d-825923f08b48@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsb5lpn1.fsf@doe.com>
在 2023/2/16 下午9:13, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) 写道:
> Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@bytedance.com> writes:
>
>> From: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@bytedance.com>
>>
>> When disable and enable dioread_nolock by remount, we may see
>> dioread_lock in ext4_do_writepages while see dioread_nolock in
>> mpage_map_one_extent. This inconsistency may triger the warning
>> in ext4_add_complete_io when the io_end->handle is NULL. Although
>> this warning is harmless in most cases, there is still a risk of
>> insufficient log reservation in conversion of unwritten extents.
>>
>
> Sorry, I haven't completely gone through the patch yet. But this idea of
> caching the initial value of mount parameter and passing it do different
> functions while an I/O request completes, is not looking right to me.
>
> If that's the case shouldn't we disallow this mount option to change
> until all the outstanding I/O's are done or complete?
> Then we need not cache the value of dioread_nolock at the start of
> writepages and continue to pass it down in case it it changes.
>
> Just my initial thoughts.
>
> -ritesh
>
Fair enough, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-16 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-07 12:41 Jinke Han
2023-02-16 13:13 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-02-16 16:10 ` hanjinke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc8f48ce-7280-c70a-db7d-825923f08b48@bytedance.com \
--to=hanjinke.666@bytedance.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®