Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] perf report: Sort by sampled cycles percent per block for stdio

["Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>]

On 10/22/2019 12:08 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 01:33:48PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> +			cycles += bi->cycles_aggr / bi->num_aggr;
>> +
>> +			he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
>> +							  &al, bi);
>> +			if (!he_block) {
>> +				block_info__put(bi);
>> +				return -1;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (block_cycles)
>> +		*block_cycles += cycles;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int resort_cb(struct hist_entry *he, void *arg __maybe_unused)
>> +{
>> +	/* Skip the calculation of column length in output_resort */
>> +	he->filtered = true;
> 
> that's a nasty hack ;-) together with setting it back to false just below
> 
> why do you want to skip the columns calculation? we could add those columns
> to the output as well no?
> 
> jirka
> 

The columns calculation for this case causes the crash. The current 
columns calculation requires some information but we don't provide. So I 
just want to skip the columns calculation.

OK, I will check how to avoid this nasty hack.

Thanks
Jin Yao

>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void hists__clear_filtered(struct hists *hists)
>> +{
>> +	struct rb_node *next = rb_first_cached(&hists->entries);
>> +	struct hist_entry *he;
>> +
>> +	while (next) {
>> +		he = rb_entry(next, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
>> +		he->filtered = false;
>> +		next = rb_next(&he->rb_node);
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> SNIP
> 
> jirka
>