From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@denx.de>,
"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Sudip Mukherjee" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/148] 6.0.19-rc1 review
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:18:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd62bccb-6970-4cdb-ae23-792b5867705d@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYtpM7X15rY6g6asDxrjxDSfj5sDiP8P5Yb1TS3VVmjGNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023, at 07:16, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions on arm64 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> While running LTP controllers cgroup_fj_stress_blkio test cases
> the Insufficient stack space to handle exception! occurred and
> followed by kernel panic on arm64 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B with
> clang-15 built kernel Image.
>
> The full boot and test log attached to this email and build and
> Kconfig links provided in the bottom of this email.
>
> I will try to reproduce this reported issue and get back to you.
I looked at the log between 6.0.18 and 6.0.19-rc1, but don't see
any arm64 or memory management patches that could result in this.
Do you know if 6.0.18 ran successfull
> [ 2893.044339] Insufficient stack space to handle exception!
> [ 2893.044351] ESR: 0x0000000096000047 -- DABT (current EL)
> [ 2893.044360] FAR: 0xffff8000128180d0
> [ 2893.044364] Task stack: [0xffff800012a18000..0xffff800012a1c000]
> [ 2893.044370] IRQ stack: [0xffff80000a798000..0xffff80000a79c000]
> [ 2893.044375] Overflow stack: [0xffff0000f77c4310..0xffff0000f77c5310]
...
> [ 2893.044413] pc : el1h_64_sync+0x0/0x68
> [ 2893.044430] lr : wp_page_copy+0xf8/0x90c
> [ 2893.044445] sp : ffff8000128180d0
...
> [ 2893.044692] el1h_64_sync+0x0/0x68
> [ 2893.044700] do_wp_page+0x4a0/0x5c8
> [ 2893.044708] handle_mm_fault+0x7fc/0x14dc
> [ 2893.044718] do_page_fault+0x29c/0x450
> [ 2893.044727] do_mem_abort+0x4c/0xf8
> [ 2893.044741] el0_da+0x48/0xa8
> [ 2893.044750] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xf0
> [ 2893.044759] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
It claims that the stack overflow happened in do_wp_page(),
but that has a really short call chain. It would be good
to have the source line for do_wp_page+0x4a0/0x5c8 and
wp_page_copy+0xf8/0x90c to see where exactly it was.
> [ 2893.285975] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 315758 at kernel/sched/core.c:3119
> set_task_cpu+0x14c/0x208
....
> [ 2893.286117] CPU: 2 PID: 315758 Comm: cgroup_fj_stres Not tainted
> [ 2893.286416] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x44/0x54
> [ 2893.286427] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x220
> [ 2893.286439] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x38/0x50
> [ 2893.286447] gic_handle_irq+0x68/0xe8
> [ 2893.286455] el1_interrupt+0x88/0xc8
> [ 2893.286464] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
> [ 2893.286474] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
> [ 2893.286482] panic+0x2d8/0x374
This is apparently a second unrelated bug -- it still processes timer
interrupts after calling panic() and this apparently fails because
the system is already unusable.
> artifact-location:
> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2K9JDtix2mHMoYRjNkBef3oR5JT
file not found. I tried to get the vmlinux file to look at the disassembly
but the artifacts appear to be gone already.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-11 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 18:01 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-10 19:23 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-01-11 0:37 ` Shuah Khan
2023-01-11 11:17 ` Jon Hunter
2023-01-11 13:00 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2023-01-11 13:09 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-01-11 13:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-11 17:25 ` Justin Forbes
2023-01-11 18:56 ` Conor Dooley
2023-01-12 0:39 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <CA+G9fYtpM7X15rY6g6asDxrjxDSfj5sDiP8P5Yb1TS3VVmjGNw@mail.gmail.com>
2023-01-11 6:23 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-11 8:18 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2023-01-11 9:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-11 11:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-01-11 12:52 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-13 9:32 ` Pavel Machek
2023-01-13 15:48 ` Naresh Kamboju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd62bccb-6970-4cdb-ae23-792b5867705d@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®