Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mailbox: tmelite-qmp: Introduce TMEL QMP mailbox driver

[Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>]

On 3/4/2025 3:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Sricharan Ramabadhran
> <quic_srichara@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/3/2025 6:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:42PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/28/2025 12:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:23:56AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> +          dev_err(dev, "Failed with status: %d\n", msg.resp.status);
>>>>>> +          ret = msg.resp.status;
>>>>>
>>>>> return msg.resp.status (is it really errno?)
>>>>>
>>>> ok, yes error.
>>>
>>> The question was if it is an errno, not if it is an error.
>> status != 0 is an error always.
> 
> Is it an _errno_ ?
Ho ok, good catch, checked the firmware spec, does not map to a standard 
Linux error code. Will check and return a standard __errno__.

Regards,
  Sricharan