From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751664AbdKTWkR (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:40:17 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:61920 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751292AbdKTWkP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:40:15 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,430,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="10055557" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] NTB bug fixes for v4.15 To: Stephen Rothwell , Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jon Mason , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ntb@googlegroups.com References: <20171119152536.GA17838@graymalkin.kudzu.us> <338c8f27-369b-11c4-f764-b8f726038f35@deltatee.com> <20171121093719.211f8194@canb.auug.org.au> From: Dave Jiang Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:40:13 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171121093719.211f8194@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/20/2017 03:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Logan, > > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 23:51:48 -0700 Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> >>> I do want to protest the timing and the lack of linux-next coverage. >>> If it has really been ready for months, why hasn't it been in >>> linux-next at all? >> >> Understood. I can't speak for Jon, but in the future if I have patches >> in the queue, I will definitely remind him to send it to Stephen for the >> linux-next tree. And I'll make sure it gets there ahead of the merge window. > > OK, all I need is the (git) URL for a tree/branch (or tag) and a > contact (or more than one) to whom I can report conflicts and build > problems. I then fetch it every day (so all you have to do it add stuff > to that branch when it is ready). > > I noticed that one of the current set of commits removed Jon as a > MAINTAINER, so I am not sure what part he would play. > He is still the NTB subsystem maintainer with more hardware drivers continue being added. I just removed him from the Intel hardware driver so he's not getting bothered with questions that should be coming to me.