Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel

["Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>]

Am 19.11.23 um 07:47 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>> On 12.11.23 01:46, Phillip Susi wrote:
>>> I had been testing some things on a post 6.6-rc5 kernel for a week or
>>> two and then when I pulled to a post 6.6 release kernel, I found that
>>> system suspend was broken.  It seems that the radeon driver failed to
>>> suspend, leaving the display dead, the wayland display server hung, and
>>> the system still running.  I have been trying to bisect it for the last
>>> few days and have only been able to narrow it down to the following 3
>>> commits:
>>>
>>> There are only 'skip'ped commits left to test.
>>> The first bad commit could be any of:
>>> 56e449603f0ac580700621a356d35d5716a62ce5
>>> c07bf1636f0005f9eb7956404490672286ea59d3
>>> b70438004a14f4d0f9890b3297cd66248728546c
>>> We cannot bisect more!
>> Hmm, not a single reply from the amdgpu folks. Wondering how we can
>> encourage them to look into this.
>>
>> Phillip, reporting issues by mail should still work, but you might have
>> more luck here, as that's where the amdgpu afaics prefer to track bugs:
>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues
>>
>> When you file an issue there, please mention it here.
>>
>> Furthermore it might help if you could verify if 6.7-rc1 (or rc2, which
>> comes out later today) or 6.6.2-rc1 improve things.
> It would also be good to test if reverting any of these is possible or not.

Well none of the commits mentioned can affect radeon in any way. Radeon 
simply doesn't use the scheduler.

My suspicion is that the user is actually using amdgpu instead of 
radeon. The switch potentially occurred accidentally, for example by 
compiling amdgpu support for SI/CIK.

Those amdgpu problems for older ASIC have already been worked on and 
should be fixed by now.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> File the gitlab issue and we should poke amd a but more to take a look.
>
> Dave.