From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] x86/pti/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 entry trampoline
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 05:59:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdca2ca6-6081-7d6f-9c17-a15446ffbb20@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e3d01ce04315218d3f8ee269528bb774a4d1d60.1532281180.git.luto@kernel.org>
On 07/22/2018 10:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> static void __init pti_clone_user_shared(void)
> {
> + unsigned cpu;
> +
> pti_clone_p4d(CPU_ENTRY_AREA_BASE);
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + /*
> + * The SYSCALL64 entry code needs to be able to find the
> + * thread stack and needs one word of scratch space in which
> + * to spill a register. All of this lives in the TSS, in
> + * the sp1 and sp2 slots.
> + */
I had to remind myself about the r/o cpu_entry_area alias here. Should
we maybe call it out explicitly?
/*
* The TSS is also mapped read-only into the cpu_entry_area.
* The cpu_entry_area copy is used r/o by the hardware for the
* hardware stack switching, like interrupt entry.
*
* The copies being mapped here are the normal r/w per-cpu
* areas. We need r/w because we spill a register here.
*/
BTW, since we have this alias, do we still *need* the r/o cpu_entry_area
alias? Or do we still get some value from keeping the thing referenced
by hardware r/o?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-23 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-22 17:45 [RFC 0/2] Get rid of the " Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-22 17:45 ` [RFC 1/2] x86/entry/64: Use the TSS sp2 slot for rsp_scratch Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-22 20:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-23 12:38 ` Dave Hansen
2018-07-24 2:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-22 17:45 ` [RFC 2/2] x86/pti/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 entry trampoline Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-22 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-22 20:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-23 12:59 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bdca2ca6-6081-7d6f-9c17-a15446ffbb20@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome